Religious language- 20th century

?
  • Created by: dunford_
  • Created on: 28-05-19 15:00
What did the Vienna circle believe about statements being meaningful?
They must be able to be empirically tested to be classified as meaningful
1 of 15
What distinguishes Ayer from the Vienna Circle?
His verification in principle
2 of 15
What does verification in principle mean?
Something is not required to be verified conclusively but we need to say how we would verify it.
3 of 15
What did Hick put forward to support the verification principle?
Eschatological verification- meaning that at the end of things we will be able to verify God
4 of 15
Who devised the falsification theory?
Karl Popper
5 of 15
Who applied the falsification theory to religious language?
Flew
6 of 15
How did Flew apply this to religious language?
He used the parable of the invisible gardener which concluded that religious language is meaningless as is suffers 'the death of a thousand qualifications'
7 of 15
Who used the parable of the lunatic to convey that religious language is meaningful to individuals?
R.M Hare
8 of 15
What are bliks?
The term was devised by Hare to mean a basic unfalsifiable belief
9 of 15
What does Mitchell's parable of the freedom fighter emphasise about religious language?
Religious language is meaningless but there is a genuine role for faith
10 of 15
Toys in the cupboard come alive at night was devised by whom?
Swinburne
11 of 15
Who said 'philosophical problems arise when language goes on holiday'?
Wittgenstein
12 of 15
What does Wittgenstein mean by language games?
Language is like playing a game with rules. Not everyone will understand language, as meanings are not fixed but different within different games. For example a 'bishop' is different for people in the church and chess players.
13 of 15
How can language games be applied to religious language?
Religious language is a language game. We cannot say a statement is true in a literal sense but it may fit with a christian interpretation of the world.
14 of 15
Is religious language meanigful although it is non cognitive?
For Wittgenstein it is meaningful for the individual despite the fact they are non cognitive?
15 of 15

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

What distinguishes Ayer from the Vienna Circle?

Back

His verification in principle

Card 3

Front

What does verification in principle mean?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

What did Hick put forward to support the verification principle?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Who devised the falsification theory?

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Religious Studies resources:

See all Religious Studies resources »See all Philosophy resources »