Other questions in this quiz

2. who was more able to disregard inadmissible evidence?

  • those who had no legal explanation
  • those who had no legal explanation

3. What was the aim in Pennington and Hastie?

  • to investigate if hearing psychological research which casts doubt on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony affects jurors decision by making them more sceptical about the testimony
  • To find out if story evidence summaries are true causes of final verdict decisions and the extent to which story order affects confidence in those decisions
  • effect on prior convictions, how much cred of witness affects ability to ignore inadmissible evidence, to look at role of judges instructions when followed by a legal explanation

4. How was the case of commonwealth of massacheuttes vs cadwell presented?

  • tape recording of stimulus trial
  • informative booklet

5. What condition convinced more of Cadwells guilt?

  • Story order
  • witness order


No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Criminological and Forensic Psychology resources »