Psychology- LOP 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyCognitive PsychologyASOCR Created by: Zoe WhitemanCreated on: 26-09-14 11:39 What is Strategic Processing? Looks e.g CAPITALS (Shallow) 1 of 35 Is Strategic Processing the Best, Intermediate or Worst for memory? Worst 2 of 35 What is Semantic Processing? Meaning e.g Do you eat.......? (Deep) 3 of 35 Is Semantic Processing the Best, Intermediate or Worst for memory? Best 4 of 35 What is Phonetic Processing? Sound e.g Rhyme... Pig/Wig 5 of 35 Is Phonetic Processing the Best, Intermediate or Worst for memory? Intermediate 6 of 35 What is Maintenance Rehearsal? (+ Example) Repetition e.g Phonetic Processing, Phonetic Processing, Phonetic Processing... (Shallow) 7 of 35 Is Maintenance Rehearsal good or poor for memory? Poor, Short Term 8 of 35 What is Elaborative Rehearsal? Consideration e.g Do you eat....? (Deep) 9 of 35 Is Elaborative Rehearsal good or poor for memory? Good, Long Term 10 of 35 Name two Cognitive Assumptions Brain Like a Computer, Scientific, Memory 11 of 35 What are the three parts to Memory in Cognitive Assumptions? Encoding, Storage, Retreival 12 of 35 What is implied by the Scientific Cognitive Assumption? What type of thing is studied? Hypothesis and Experiments on Cognition inlcuding studying brain damaged people and its effect on cognition 13 of 35 What does the Computer Cognitive Assumption involve? Input, Process, Output 14 of 35 What parts of a computer resemble the human brain? Computer Keyboard/Mouse= Human Sensors, Computer CPU= Human Brain Working, Computer Screen/Printer= Human Reaction/Behaviour/Actions 15 of 35 What does TOAST stand for? T= Things Cannot Explain, O= Opposing Studies/ Theories, A= Applications, S= Supporting Studies/ Theories, T= Testable 16 of 35 What year did Craik and Tulving conduct thier experiment? 1975 17 of 35 Does Craik and Tulving's experiment support LOP or not? It Supports LOP 18 of 35 What percentage of words did participants recall when semantically processed? 65% 19 of 35 what percentage of words did participants recall when strucurally processed? 17% 20 of 35 What year did Morris et al conduct his experiment? 1981 21 of 35 Does Morris et al's experiment support LOP or not? It Supports LOP 22 of 35 What was Morris et al's experiment about? Football supporters and non-supporters remembering scores. 23 of 35 Why were the supporters better at remembering the scores? Becuase they were relating the scores to league positions and therfore processing the information more deeply. 24 of 35 What year was the Neuroscience study in Nyberg in? 2002 25 of 35 Does the Neuroscience study in Nyberg Support LOP or not? It Supports LOP 26 of 35 What does the frontal/temporial lobes of the brain process? Semantic Processing 27 of 35 Who conducted an experiment in the year 2003? Diseth and Martinsen 28 of 35 Who did Diseth and Martinsen study? Norwegian Undergraduate Psychology Students 29 of 35 What were Diseth and Martinsen's findings? The students who demonstrated high levels of surface learning had higher exam marks. 30 of 35 Does Diseth and Martinsens's study support LOP or not? It Opposes LOP 31 of 35 What year did Reber et al conduct his study? 1994 32 of 35 What did Reber et al Study? + Example? The arguement that factors other than depth of processing affect how well things are remebered e.g. Emothinal Significance or Unusual Events. 33 of 35 What were Reber et al's findings? Depth of processing didn't affect recall of words when the were emotionally significant. 34 of 35 Does Reber et al's study support LOP or not? It Challenges LOP 35 of 35
Comments
No comments have yet been made