Psychology - Research Methods

?
  • Created by: pbowman
  • Created on: 13-05-17 18:30
Ethics
Moral guidelines used by psychologists studying human behaviour to protect their participants. The ethical guidelines are provided by the British Psychological Society.
1 of 206
DCCOWPAD
Deception, Consent, Confidentiality, Observation, Withdrawal, Protection, Advice, Debriefing.
2 of 206
Respect
Consent, Confidentiality, Withdrawal. Must gain permission from participants and allow them to withdraw. Must respect personal details and data by keeping it confidential.
3 of 206
Competence
Advice. Psychologists must work within their own capabilities, and not giving advice if no qualified to do so.
4 of 206
Responsibility
Protection, Debrief. Psychologist have a responsibility to protect participants and ensure they're fully debriefed.
5 of 206
Integrity
Deception, Observation. Psychologists should have high standards regarding honesty, accuracy, clarity and fairness, and they must avoid deception.
6 of 206
Sample and Sampling
Who is used in a study and how they are recruited.
7 of 206
Target Population
The total group of individuals from which the sample might be drawn, e.g. students.
8 of 206
Random Sampling
Target population has an equal chance of being chosen, e.g. by random number generator.
9 of 206
Random sampling - Advantages
Non biased.
10 of 206
Random Sampling - Disadvantages
Time consuming to make a list of all participants and some less or not willing to participate.
11 of 206
Snowball Sampling
Asking participants to nominate another person who has the same characteristics being sampled.
12 of 206
Snowball Sampling - Advantages
Find participants with niche traits or characteristics.
13 of 206
Snowball Sampling - Disadvantages
Ethical issues, can lose control of participants and time consuming.
14 of 206
Opportunity Sampling
Selecting people who are ready and avaliable.
15 of 206
Opportunity Sampling - Advantages
It is convinient, cheap and quick.
16 of 206
Opportunity Sampling - Disavantages
It can be biased and unrepresentative.
17 of 206
Volunteer Sampling (Self-Selecting)
Participants select themseleves to participate.
18 of 206
Volunteer Sampling - Advantages
The participants are willing and less likely to withdraw.
19 of 206
Volunteer Sampling - Disadvantages
It is time consuming to gather participants and can be unrepresentative.
20 of 206
Ethnocentrism
When a sample is taken from one area or culture.
21 of 206
Ethnocentrism - Advantages
Easy to recruit.
22 of 206
Ethnocentrism - Disadvantages
Not representative - cannot be generalised.
23 of 206
Independent Variable (IV)
What the research looks for a difference between, what they are comparing (what they change) e.g. Gender, Age, Culture.
24 of 206
Dependent Variable (DV)
The variable that the research measures, e.g. a score on a test or a timing.
25 of 206
Extraneous Variable
Any variables controlled by the researcher, also known as controls, e.g. all participants have a drink of water before a memory test.
26 of 206
Confounding Variable
Any variables not controlled by the researcher that could ruin the result e.g. temperature in a room during a memory test.
27 of 206
Lab Experiment
When the environment is controlled and the conditions are manipulated.
28 of 206
Lab - Advantages
Researcher has control, so there are fewer confounding variables. Can see if IV has an effect on DV.
29 of 206
Lab - Disadvantages
Often low in ecological validity, and prone to demand characteristics.
30 of 206
Field Experiment
Conducted where you would expect to see the that behaviour occur and there are manipulated IVs.
31 of 206
Field - Advantages
High in ecological validity as it is natural behaviour, still have control over IVs to see if it has an effect on the DV.
32 of 206
Field - Disadvantages
May have confounding variables that cant be controlled.
33 of 206
Quasi Experiment
When the IV is naturally occuring - researcher hasnt manipulated them e.g. gender, age.
34 of 206
Quasi - Advantages
High in ecological validity as IV is naturally occuring.
35 of 206
Quasi - Disadvantages
Difficult to see cause and effect as the researcher hasnt manipulated the IV.
36 of 206
Hypothesis - Experiments
These look for a difference.
37 of 206
Alternate Hypothesis - Experiments
This says there WILL be a significant DIFFERENCE. Also known as an experimental hypothesis.
38 of 206
Null Hypothesis - Experiments
This hypothesis says there WONT be a significant DIFFERENCE.
39 of 206
One Tailed / Directional Hypothesis - Experiments
These state the direction of the experiment, e.g. Boys will perform significantly better than girls on the memory test out of 10.
40 of 206
Two Tailed / Non Directional Hypothesis - Experiments
These dont state the direction of the experiment, e.g. there will be a significant difference between girls and boys performance on a memory test out of 10.
41 of 206
Hypothesis - Correlations
These look for a relationship.
42 of 206
Alternate Hypothesis - Correlations
This hypothesis says there WILL be a significant RELATIONSHIP. Also known as a correlational hypothesis.
43 of 206
Null Hypothesis - Correlations
This hypothesis says there WONT be a significant RELATIONSHIP.
44 of 206
One Tailed / Directional Hypothesis - Correlations
These state the direction of the correlation, e.g. there will be a positive correlation between happiness and chocolate.
45 of 206
Two Tailed / Non Directional Hypothesis - Correlations
These dont state the direction of the correlation, e.g. there will be a significant relationship between chocolate and happiness.
46 of 206
Structured Observation
The researcher has a behaviour checklist to tally so they have structure to the way they record data.
47 of 206
Structured Observation - Advantages
Know what to focus on and what behaviours to look for.
48 of 206
Structured Observation - Disadvantages
May be hard to find certain behaviours.
49 of 206
Unstructured Observation
The researcher doesn't have a pre-determined behaviour checklist. They dont have structure as to how they record data.
50 of 206
Unstructured Observation - Advantages
You can change your mind to fit the behaviours in the surrounding areas.
51 of 206
Unstructured Observation - Disadvantages
Harder to record the data as it is collected in the moment.
52 of 206
Naturalistic Observation
An observation carried out in a natural environment, where you'd expect that behaviour occur.
53 of 206
Naturalistic Observation - Advantages
See realistic behaviours, it reduces the chance of demand characteristics, and is high in ecological validity.
54 of 206
Naturalistic Observation - Disadvantages
Can be unethical, and there is generally less control.
55 of 206
Controlled Observation
Usually conducted in a controlled setting. The researcher controls who they will observe and often the participants know they are being observed.
56 of 206
Controlled Observation - Advantages
They have more control over the experiment.
57 of 206
Controlled Observation - Disadvantages
The participants know they are being observed so they often display demand characteristics.
58 of 206
Participant Observation
Where the observers are part of, or are pretending to be part of the participants that are being observed.
59 of 206
Participant Observation - Advantages
It can give a more natural feel to the observation, and you gather primary data.
60 of 206
Participant Observation - Disadvantages
Participants can often show observer bias or demand characteristics.
61 of 206
Non-Participant Observation
The researcher does not participate in the behaviour/observation being held.
62 of 206
Non-Participant Observation - Advantages
It is easier to observe others behaviour and there is less chance of observer bias.
63 of 206
Non-Participant Observation - Disadvantages
You may miss certain behaviours.
64 of 206
Overt
When the participants are aware that they are being observed.
65 of 206
Overt - Advantages
You have the participants consent so it is more ethical.
66 of 206
Overt - Disadvantages
The participants may express demand characteristics.
67 of 206
Covert
When the participant doesn't know they are being observed.
68 of 206
Covert - Advantages
It makes the observation more realisitic so there is a reduced chance of demand characteristics.
69 of 206
Covert - Disadvantages
It can be unethical as the participant hasnt given formal consent, or may not be aware so they cannot withdraw either.
70 of 206
Behavioural Categories
When there are categories of behaviours on a checklist to observe during an observation.
71 of 206
Behavioural Categories - Advantages
You know what you are looking for (behaviours).
72 of 206
Behavioural Categories - Disadvantages
It may limit you to only observe specific behaviours, which means you may miss other behaviours that help show the cause and effect of something.
73 of 206
Coding Frames
When behavioural categories are coded and can be rated for severity, e.g. 1 = light punch, 5 = hard punch.
74 of 206
Coding Frames - Advantages
It is easier to note the observations down, and give a bit more detail.
75 of 206
Coding Frames - Disadvantages
It is harder for different observers to interpret, because someone may consider a punch light, is what someone may interpret as a hard punch.
76 of 206
Observer Effects
When the presence of an observer in an overt observation changes the behaviour of the participants.
77 of 206
Observer Effects - Disadvantages
It shows demand characteristics and means the observation is not measuriong what is intended.
78 of 206
Time Sampling
The observer records what the participant is doing in a fixed time intervals e.g. every 5 seconds in 20 minutes.
79 of 206
Time Sampling - Advantages
Having fixed intervals means it shows changes to behaviour through out a fixed period of time, and you are less likely to miss behaviours.
80 of 206
Time Sampling - Disadvantages
You may miss some behaviours during the periods of time it is being recorded.
81 of 206
Event Sampling
Researcher recording behaviour everytime its happens.
82 of 206
Event Sampling - Advantages
It is easy to record, and you may get more data than in time sampling.
83 of 206
Event Sampling - Disadvantages
You may miss a behaviour if lots of different behaviours occur simultaneously.
84 of 206
Inter-rater Reliability - Internal
When 2 or more observers observe the same behaviours at the same time using the same checklists. They come together at the end of the observation and correlate their results to see how reliable they are.
85 of 206
Inter-rater Reliability - Advantages
Means the data is more reliable.
86 of 206
Inter-rater Reliability - Disadvantages
If the data isnt (70%) sufficiently similar then they may have recorded the data wrong and its time consuming.
87 of 206
Observer Bias
When the observer interprets the behaviour or the data how they want to.
88 of 206
Observer Bias - Advantages
Relative to the object of the observation.
89 of 206
Observer Bias - Disadvantages
It is bias, so can make the data unreliable.
90 of 206
Self-Reports
Main 2 types are questionnaires and interviews.
91 of 206
Questionnaire
Set of questions for the purpose of a study or survey.
92 of 206
Questionnaire - Advantages
They are practical, and can gather large amounts of data in a short period of time and its cheap.
93 of 206
Questionnaire - Disadvantages
They can lack validity due to social desirability bias and response bias, also not everyone will respond.
94 of 206
Structured Interview
Interview with pre-determined questions, e.g. a formal job interview.
95 of 206
Structured Interview - Advantages
It allows the interviewer to ask the questions they need to, they can find specific behaviours and have clear direction.
96 of 206
Structured Interview - Disadvantages
It is time consuming, you may experience demand characteristics and you may not ask other questions if you are so focused on the set questions.
97 of 206
Unstructured Interview
An interview without pre-determined questions.
98 of 206
Unstructured Interview - Advantages
More flexible as questions can be changed and adapted to fit the respondents answer, you collect qualitative data and it has increased validity.
99 of 206
Unstructured Interview - Disadvantages
You may get confused as to what questions have or havent been asked and there is no direction so you may miss questions.
100 of 206
Semi-Structured Interview
An interview with pre-determined questions but is allowed to go off topic if neccessary.
101 of 206
Semi-Structured Interview - Advantages
You can gather a large amount of data and it is flexible, so it is reliable.
102 of 206
Semi-Structured Interview - Disadvantages
Participants may express demand characteristics and flexibility may lessen the reliability.
103 of 206
Open Questions
A question with no restricted response.
104 of 206
Open Questions - Advantages
It allows for more detail to be given.
105 of 206
Open Questions - Disadvantages
It gives qualitative data which is hard to analyse.
106 of 206
Closed Questions
A question with a restricted response, e.g. yes/no questions.
107 of 206
Close Questions - Advantages
It gives quantitative data which is easy to analyse.
108 of 206
Closed Questions - Disadvantages
It doesnt allow for clarification or detail and it doesnt show the reason for answers (no cause and effect).
109 of 206
Rating Scale
Where you can rate your response e.g. 1-10 (where 1 = not stressed and 10 = stressed).
110 of 206
Rating Scale - Advantages
They are easy to read and give quantitative data, so easy to analyse.
111 of 206
Rating Scale - Disadvantages
They show no reason for answers or give no detail, also open to demand characteristics, response bias and social desirability bias.
112 of 206
Semantic Differential Rating Scale
A rating scale which uses opposing adjectives e.g. happy / sad.
113 of 206
Semantic Differential Rating Scale - Advantages
They are easy to read and give quantitative data, so easy to analyse.
114 of 206
Semantic Differential Rating Scale - Disadvantages
They show no reason for answers or give no detail, also open to demand characteristics, response bias and social desirability bias.
115 of 206
Likert Scale
A question that uses agree and disagree, neutral point is 'neither agree or disagree'.
116 of 206
Likert Scale - Advantages
They are easy to read and give quantitative data, so easy to analyse.
117 of 206
Likert Scale - Disadvantages
They show no reason for answers or give no detail, also open to demand characteristics, response bias and social desirability bias.
118 of 206
Response Bias
When participants opt for the middle number on a scale to not show extreme values.
119 of 206
Response Bias - Disadvantage
It reduces the validity, as the researcher isnt measuring accurate responses.
120 of 206
Social Desirability Bias
When participants change their behaviour to be seen as favourable by others.
121 of 206
Social Desirability Bias - Disadvantage
Reduces validity as the researcher isnt measuring accurate responses just how people want to be seen.
122 of 206
Demand Characteristics
When participants change their behaviour to suit the needs of the study.
123 of 206
Demand Characteristics - Disadvantage
Reduces validity as it isnt measuring accurate responses.
124 of 206
Positive Correlation
When the value of both co-variables increase together.
125 of 206
Negative Correlation
As the value of one variable increases, the value of the other variable decreases.
126 of 206
No Correlation
When there is no relationship between the variables.
127 of 206
Correlations - Advantages
You can see the direction/relationship between 2 variables. It can be the only ethical way to do research because they often use data that has already been conducted.
128 of 206
Correlations - Disadvantages
You cannot assume cause and effect and the data is limited, so we dont always know the details behind the given data as it is quantitative.
129 of 206
Correlation Co-efficient
Calculates the strength and direction of the data, e.g. strength = weak/moderate/strong, direction = positive/negative.
130 of 206
Correlation Co-efficient - Scale
-1.0 = perfect/strong negative, -0.8 = moderate negative, -0.1 to -0.5 = weak negative, 0 = no correlation, 0.1 to 0.5 = weak positive, 0.8 = moderate positive, 1 = perfect/strong positive.
131 of 206
Quantitative Data
Data in the form of numbers, e.g. % or frequencies.
132 of 206
Quantitative Data - Advantages
Easy to analyse, e.g. in graphs, percentages, mean etc.
133 of 206
Quantitative Data - Disadvantages
Lacks depth and detail.
134 of 206
Qualitative Data
Data in the form of words.
135 of 206
Qualitative Data - Advantages
It gives depth, detail and insight.
136 of 206
Qualitative Data -Disadvantages
It is hard to analyse and difficult to replicate.
137 of 206
Primary Data
When the researcher collects data themselves, e.g. a interview or questionnaire.
138 of 206
Primary Data - Advantages
More reliable and the data will fit the needs of the experiment.
139 of 206
Primary Data - Disadvantages
It can be biased, and can take a long time to gather.
140 of 206
Secondary Data
When the researcher uses data collected by another person or source, e.g. a newpaper or online articles.
141 of 206
Secondary Data - Advantages
It saves time and money, and it is less biased.
142 of 206
Secondary Data - Disadvantages
The data may not fit the needs of the experiment.
143 of 206
Nominal Data
Data in categories of behaviour, e.g. 3 groups of people of tall, average and short height.
144 of 206
Ordinal Data
Data that is ordered, e.g. grades from best to worst. Rating scales are also considered ordinal.
145 of 206
Interval Data
Data that uses scales that increase in standardised intervals, e.g. height in cm, temperature, scores on a test (that havent been ordered).
146 of 206
Validity
Whether the study is measuring what it intends to.
147 of 206
Internal Validity
Whether the is measuring what it intends to within the study itself.
148 of 206
Face Validity - Internal
Accurate on the surface
149 of 206
Ecological Validity - External
How real to life a study is.
150 of 206
Descriptive Statistics
Describing the data.
151 of 206
Mean
Arithmetic average, calculated by adding all the scores together in each condition then dividing by the number of scores.
152 of 206
Mean - Advantages
Takes all scores into account.
153 of 206
Mean - Disadvantages
There can be extreme values which may inflate or deflate the average.
154 of 206
Median
Middle number, calculated by finding the midpoint in a numerically ordered list.
155 of 206
Median - Advantages
It can be used if there is an extreme value to make the data more representative.
156 of 206
Median - Disadvantages
Not all of the scores are taken into account in the final value.
157 of 206
Mode
Most common, it is calculated by finding the most common value in a set of values.
158 of 206
Mode - Advantages
It is useful when there are categories of data e.g. most common behaviour.
159 of 206
Mode - Disadvantages
Doesnt take any other scores into account.
160 of 206
Bar Graph
The height of each bar represents the frequency of each category and space should be left between bars.
161 of 206
Bar Graph - When to use it
When you have data that isnt continuous most likely use this when you have categories of behaviour; particularly for observations.
162 of 206
Histogram
Like a bar chart, axis must start at 0, no spaces between bars.
163 of 206
Histogram - When to use it
When the data is continuous, e.g. ages, weight, height, time.
164 of 206
Scattergraph
Used to represent relationships between data and plots are not joined.
165 of 206
Scattergraph - When to use it
Only if you’ve conducted a correlation.
166 of 206
Pie Chart
Alternative to a bar chart, you make each pie slice a category of behaviour.
167 of 206
Pie Chart - When to use it
When there is non-continuous data. You divide each frequency by the total frequencies and multiply by 360 degrees.
168 of 206
Line Graph
Alternative to a histogram but a dot represents each bar and a line connects each dot.
169 of 206
Line Graph - When to use it
Used to show how something changes over time, and can be useful to compare 2 or more conditions.
170 of 206
Standard Deviation
Tells us how spread out the data is from the mean, e.g. a high SD = data is very spread out from the mean, and low SD = data is close to the mean.
171 of 206
Distribution Curves
Graphs which are plotted to represent the mean and the spread of data (SD) and tell us mathematically where most of the results sit.
172 of 206
Positive Skew
Data is more spread out towards the left, which means not many scores are near the top, e.g. salaries.
173 of 206
Negative Skew
Data is more spread out towards the right, which means not many scores are near the bottom, e.g. if most of students did well on a test and few did badly.
174 of 206
Normal Distribution/Bell Curve
When the mean, median and mode and in line with one another, e.g. weight and height, IQ score.
175 of 206
Inferential Statistics
Used to fraw conclusions and make predictions (inferences) based on the descriptions of the data.
176 of 206
Probability
This is the likelihood of an event or a pattern of numbers occurs due to chance.
177 of 206
P Value - One Mainly Used
p≤ 0.05, meaning the results are 95% not up to chance.
178 of 206
Type 1 Error
False Positive - if you accept the alternate when you should have accepted the null.
179 of 206
Type 2 Error
False negative, these can occur when you accept the null when you should have accepted the alternate.
180 of 206
Statistical Tests
Chi square test, Binomial sign test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test, Spearmans Rho correlation co-efficient.
181 of 206
Parametric - When would you use it?
When you have interval data, when you dont have extreme scores (normal distribution) and when the standard deviations are not significantly different between conditions.
182 of 206
Non-Parametric Tests
Chi square test, Binomial sign test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test, Spearmans Rho correlation co-efficient.
183 of 206
Chi Square Test - More Than
When you have nominal data and the design is independent measures. You have to calculate degrees of freedom = (number of rows-1) x (number of columns-1).
184 of 206
Binomial Sign Test - Less Than
When you have nominal data and repeated measures design.
185 of 206
Mann-Whitney U Test - Less Than
When you have ordinal data and independent measures design.
186 of 206
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test - Less Than
When you have ordinal data and repeated measures design.
187 of 206
Spearmans Rho Correlation Co-efficient - More Than
When you have ordinal data and are testing for a correlation.
188 of 206
Psychology as a Science - Induction
Data comes first and is often from observing behaviour. Looks for patterns then formulate hypotheses to explore to develop conclusions and theories.
189 of 206
Psychology as a Science - Deduction
Idea comes first, then is tested (general idea to specific researching).
190 of 206
Psychology as a Science - Objectivity
Sciences should not be biased (subjective). Personal ideas should not influence results.
191 of 206
Objectivity - How it makes Psychology more Scientific
Based on facts/quantitative data; rather than the opinions, or thoughts.
192 of 206
Psychology as a Science - Replicability
If a study has lots of control and can be tested again.
193 of 206
Replicability - How it makes Psychology more Scientific
Another researcher may obtain similar results that support/dont support previous findings.
194 of 206
Psychology as a Science - Falsification
For something to be considered scientific, hypotheses must be able to be proven false.
195 of 206
Falsification - How it makes Psychology more Scientific
New research may find new evidence that counter acts previous hypotheses.
196 of 206
Psychology as a Science - The Study of Cause and Effect
The aim of research is to demonstrate a cause by manipulating an IV to observe the effect on the DV.
197 of 206
The Study of Cause and Effect - How it makes Psychology more Scientific
Controlling variables means we can say that the change in the IV has had an effect on the DV.
198 of 206
Psychology as a Science - Hypothesis Testing
Sciences should be able to predict behaviour, so must be operationalised.
199 of 206
Hypothesis Testing - How it makes Psychology more Scientific
Hypotheses can be proven wrong (null) so this goes with falsifiability.
200 of 206
Psychology as a Science - Manipulation of Variables
The aim of research is to demonstrate a cause by manipulating an IV to observe the effect on the DV.
201 of 206
Manipulation of Variables - How it makes Psychology more Scientific
Controlling variables means we can say that the change in the IV has had an effect on the DV.
202 of 206
Psychology as a Science - Control and Standardisation
Having controls and keeping things the same (standardisation).
203 of 206
Controls and Standardisation - How it makes Psychology more Scientific
This increases the replicability another researcher may/may not find the same.
204 of 206
Psychology as a Science - Quantitative Data
Recording data numerically makes the data more factual.
205 of 206
Quantitative Data - How it makes Psychology more Scientific
Makes the results more objective (no bias).
206 of 206

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Deception, Consent, Confidentiality, Observation, Withdrawal, Protection, Advice, Debriefing.

Back

DCCOWPAD

Card 3

Front

Consent, Confidentiality, Withdrawal. Must gain permission from participants and allow them to withdraw. Must respect personal details and data by keeping it confidential.

Back

Preview of the back of card 3

Card 4

Front

Advice. Psychologists must work within their own capabilities, and not giving advice if no qualified to do so.

Back

Preview of the back of card 4

Card 5

Front

Protection, Debrief. Psychologist have a responsibility to protect participants and ensure they're fully debriefed.

Back

Preview of the back of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Research methods and techniques resources »