Rhesus monkeys, wire monkeys and cloth monkeys. Love
2 of 11
John Bowlby's
Theory of attachments. Monotropy; single attachment to the primary caregiver. Internal working modal
3 of 11
Zimmerman 2000
Longitudinal study of 44 german children. Their attachment type was determined at several points in their lives. They found that attachment type in childhood was not a good predictor of adulthood attachments.
4 of 11
Ainsworth 1970
Strange situation. Found 3 different types of attachments, secure, insecure avoidant, insecure resistant.
5 of 11
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
Comparisons of Ainsworth's 'strange situation' across 8 different countries
6 of 11
Hazan and Shaver 1987
'Love quiz' found a strong relationship between childhood attachments type & adult attachment type
7 of 11
Klaus and Kennell 1976
Skin to skin hypothesis. Skin to skin contact as soon as posable builds closer bonds,
8 of 11
Koluchova, Czech Twins
Mother died, the twins returned to their father who locked them in a cold cellar. Adopted by sisters, by adulthood both boys had made a full recovery
9 of 11
Tizard and Hodges
A longitudinal study, children's attachment types were studied aged 8 and 16
10 of 11
Rutter 2007
A longitudinal study on romanian orphans
11 of 11
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Rhesus monkeys, wire monkeys and cloth monkeys. Love
Back
Harlow
Card 3
Front
Theory of attachments. Monotropy; single attachment to the primary caregiver. Internal working modal
Back
Card 4
Front
Longitudinal study of 44 german children. Their attachment type was determined at several points in their lives. They found that attachment type in childhood was not a good predictor of adulthood attachments.
Back
Card 5
Front
Strange situation. Found 3 different types of attachments, secure, insecure avoidant, insecure resistant.
Comments
Report