STM Duration: remember trigram after time counting backwards from 3 digit number = STM duration less than 18s
1 of 25
Marsh
STM Duration evidence: version of Peterson and Peterson, didn't know about aim of study, recall was only 2 secs
2 of 25
Shepard
LTM Duration: 612 memorable pics shown, after 1hr, almost perfect recall
3 of 25
Bahrick
LTM Duration: Natural exp, Yearbook names to faces 50 yrs on, 70% accurate, uncontrolled nature
4 of 25
Jacobs
STM Capacity: Digit span, 9.3 items remembered on average, 7.3 letters = more numbers than letters
5 of 25
Baddeley
STM Capacity evidence: Initial letters of post code easier to remember when memorable RWA
6 of 25
Baddeley Encode
STM and LTM encoding, List of acoustically and semantically similar words, STM encoding usually acoustic, LTM encoding usually semantic
7 of 25
Brandimote
STM encoding Eval, visual encoding used if verbal rehearsal is inhibited (verbal task during retention period)
8 of 25
Atkinson and Shiffrin
Multi Store Model sensory memory, short term memory and long term memory
9 of 25
Sperling
12 digits recalled from flash display, all digits = recall poor, for one row, recall better = sensory info decays rapidly
10 of 25
Hitch and Baddeley
performance poorer when given CE and PL task and separate CE task at same time, could not process using same stores
11 of 25
Bunge
Phonological loop capacity = 2 secs, Word length effect disappears if articulatory process is suppressed
12 of 25
Shallice and Warrington
KF Case Study, LTM and Visual STM Intact, but verbal STM poor, evidence of PL and VSS
13 of 25
Loftus and Palmer
Traffic accidents, contacted, bumped, hit, collided and smashed, higher speed estimation for smashed - leading questions influence recall
14 of 25
Loftus et al
Stop Yield sign, gave consistent info or inconsistent info about sign, worse recall for original info if given inconsistent info
15 of 25
Wells and Olsen
mistaken eyewitness testimony = largest factor in innocent conviction
16 of 25
Deffenbacher
Anxiety on ewt = Meta analysis,18 studies, stress has negative impact on eyewitness recall
17 of 25
Johnson and scott
Anxiety on ewt = Weapon Focus effect, 2 conditions, criminal with greased pen or bloody knife, less accurate with bloody knife
18 of 25
Rinolo
Titanic sinking, survivors reported that ship split in half, proved right, anxiety MAY NOT worsen recall
19 of 25
Parker and Carranza
Age and EWT = children more likely to make errors
20 of 25
Yarmey/Memon
Old adults, same accuracy but less confidence in confederate recall than young adults/accuracy in older people, not long lasting, dropped after a week
21 of 25
Anastasi and Rhodes
Own age bias, recall more accurate when target photos are of similar age to ppt
22 of 25
Fisher and Geiselman
Cognitive interview: Report everything, mental reinstatement of original context, changing order and changing perspective
23 of 25
Kebbel and Wagstaff
different police depts use different versions of CI, makes comparison difficult, CI is also more time consuming, preference for limiting amount of info
24 of 25
Milne and Bull
Lab experiment, first 2 steps, more effective than just standard interview, instructing to try again was less effective than using another aspect
25 of 25
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
STM Duration evidence: version of Peterson and Peterson, didn't know about aim of study, recall was only 2 secs
Back
Marsh
Card 3
Front
LTM Duration: 612 memorable pics shown, after 1hr, almost perfect recall
Back
Card 4
Front
LTM Duration: Natural exp, Yearbook names to faces 50 yrs on, 70% accurate, uncontrolled nature
Back
Card 5
Front
STM Capacity: Digit span, 9.3 items remembered on average, 7.3 letters = more numbers than letters
Comments
No comments have yet been made