Private Nusiance - Defences

?
  • Created by: Jamila
  • Created on: 09-04-13 01:17
Statutory Defences
Allen v Gulf refinery limited - act of parliament to carry out the operation
1 of 8
Presciption
Sturges v Bridgman - business been there for 20 years. then got a dental room in the background, not sufficent.
2 of 8
Ineffective Defence, coming to Nusiance - Muller v Jackson
cricket club for 70 years, ball went into house. no claim, that they came to area.
3 of 8
Ineffective D, Public benefit - Adams v Ursell
chicken and chip shop smell, cause hardship to people, not good.
4 of 8
Contributory actions - Lambton v Mellish
D playing organs as well but tried to complain.
5 of 8
Public Nusiance
materially affects the reasonable comfort and convience of life of a class of her majesty subjects.
6 of 8
Special damage - Benjamin v Stor
van left outside shop affects individual much more special victim.
7 of 8
Projections over a highway
Tarry v ashton, Nobel v Harrison.
8 of 8

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Presciption

Back

Sturges v Bridgman - business been there for 20 years. then got a dental room in the background, not sufficent.

Card 3

Front

Ineffective Defence, coming to Nusiance - Muller v Jackson

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Ineffective D, Public benefit - Adams v Ursell

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Contributory actions - Lambton v Mellish

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar All resources:

See all All resources »