Other questions in this quiz

2. Why was there a second procedure?

  • Done to check the validity of the first experiment
  • Done to check the of the first experiment
  • Done to check the reliability of the first experiment
  • Done to check the ethics of the first experiment

3. What were the 5 objects the man came in with?

  • Scissors, Hand gun, Wallet, Chicken and Nothing
  • Scissors, hand gun, chicken, a knife and nothing
  • Scissors, machine gun, cheese, a dog and nothing
  • Scissors, hand gun, wallet, a toy and nothing

4. What changed in the second procedure?

  • The items and the location
  • Length of video
  • The aim
  • The man

5. What was the conclusion for the 1st procedure?

  • The handgun and knife resulted in the lowest recall, while the scissors and chicken had less of an effect. It can be deduced that the good recall was caused by high unusualness
  • high threat is the only cause of the low recall and therefore proves weapon focus is something to be aware of
  • The handgun and raw chicken resulted in the lowest recall, while the scissors and wallet had less of an effect. It can be deduced that the poor recall was caused by high unusualness
  • The handgun and raw chicken resulted in the lowest recall, while the scissors and wallet had less of an effect. It can be deduced that the poor recall was caused by high threat

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Criminological and Forensic Psychology resources »