Upholds ethical guidelines of consent, more ethical. Biased, certain type (confident)
3 of 15
Opportunity strength & weakness?
Quick to find specific mix. Biased on researcher - choose helpful (unrepresentative)
4 of 15
Random strength & weakness?
Not biased - representative sample. Limited methods - breaks consent.
5 of 15
Name 6 ethical guidelines.
Consent, Deception, Right to withdraw, Protection from harm, confidentiality, debrief.
6 of 15
Meaning of validity?
Accuracy and honesty.
7 of 15
x4 factors related to validity
Demand characteristics, Controls (eliminate extraneous variables), Deceiving of aims so can't change behaviour, socially desirable answers.
8 of 15
Meaning of reliability?
Consistency & Standardized
9 of 15
5 factors related to reliability?
Large sample, Repeating study (see if same results obtained), technical equipment to obtain results, collecting data in number of ways/compare, Procedure detailed - replicable by others.
10 of 15
Strengths of quantitative data? x2
easier to analyse & compare, more objective (scientific).
11 of 15
Weaknesses of quantitative? x2
Reduces info, over-simplified statistics. No reasons why behaviour occured.
12 of 15
Qualitative strengths? x2
In-depth & detailed info, Offers explanations.
13 of 15
Weaknesses of qualitative?
More open to misinterpretation, difficult to analyse & compare.
Comments
No comments have yet been made