Perception core study- Haber and Levin 2001

?
P N O P E N N B F K A W R F C M
J G X S G E V O C N T F C W N P
Q T S Y X Q D E E M Q I D M L H
H M M C W J C A I Y E N T A Y A
K I S O X C O A L N U D U L C P
I C I A S C N B D B P I T F I P
N U C M U W C A R V A N E U Y Q
M F I C F P L V H A P G A L R I
Y W T I E V U X V H F S K E K B
I M I B R C S L E X E Y F T J Q
I K R V Y Q I T D T G I R B H J
U I C K Y T O B W X C P R Q N P
D C F T N G N J X D T Q P Y P N
I E D W G I A M C T N H C N U O
H D I H N X B M U P L G S Y A E
S W I F M M B K N U F R N F B L

Clues

  • The estimates were most accurate for the items in section 2. The estimates of the other items in section 3 and 4 were not so accurate. (8)
  • They concluded it was easier for participants to tell distance of real life objects because they were relying on prior experience. if the nativist (10)
  • To investigate the argument between top-down and bottom up theories of perception. (3)
  • Unrepresentative sample. Very small. All male participant gender bias. All college students, not easy to generalize the findings. (10)

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Perception resources »