Other questions in this quiz

2. The case 'Gibson V Manchester City Council' falls under which category?

  • Final Acceptance
  • Revocation
  • ITT
  • Unilateral offer

3. Which case established the position that the communication of the revocation of the offer can be conducted by a third party who is a reliable source?

  • Erington V Erington
  • Fawcett V Smethurst
  • Dickinson V Dodd
  • Shuey V US

4. What are the correct facts of Fisher V Bell?

  • Defendant distributed a wine list which was an ITT and not an offer to sell at those prices.
  • defendant advertised in a magazine,selling wild rare birds and hence was guilty as he offered to sell the 'rare bird' as dealing in them was illegal.
  • Defendant displayed flick knives on the shop window,however was not guilty as the display was an ITT and not an offer to sell.
  • Defendant displayed flick knives and was guilty as he offered to sell 'such' knives.

5. Which of the following cases establishes the rule that acceptance should be unconditional?

  • Tinn V Hoffman
  • Household Insurance V Grant
  • Adam V Lindsel
  • Entores


No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Offer and Acceptance resources »