Occupiers liability 0.0 / 5 ? LawLaw of TortA2/A-levelAQA Created by: Y14Created on: 14-04-21 14:41 The test for deciding whether a person is the occupier is found in case law. Wheat v E Lacon & Co. Ltd [1966] 1 of 5 courts will find out that no one is in control of the premises. Bailey v Armes (1999) 2 of 5 The occupier does not have to make the premises completely safe for the visitor,only to do what is reasonable. Laverton v Kiapasha Takeaway Supreme [2002] 3 of 5 What may not pose a threat to an adult may be very dangerous to a child. Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922]. 4 of 5 The courts are reluctant to find the occupier liable as the child should be under supervision of a parent or other adult. Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955]. 5 of 5
Comments
No comments have yet been made