Non-Fatal Offences

?
  • Created by: Shannon
  • Created on: 14-01-13 19:03
Assault Definition
An act or words that causes the V to apprehend the infliction of immediate unlawful force.
1 of 28
Act
Requires some act or words, omission is not enough. Can be verbal or written (Ireland/Constanza)
2 of 28
Apprehend Immediate Unlawful Force
Lamb - no assault if obvious D can't use force Smith v Woking - Immediate means imminent Tuberville v Savage - Words can negate an assault
3 of 28
Unlawful Force
Oppsite of lawful force - genuine consent or self-defence/prevention of a crime
4 of 28
Mens Rea
Intention or recklessness
5 of 28
Battery Definition
Application of unlawful force (includes the slightest touch) (Collins v Wilcock/Wood(Fraser) v DPP)
6 of 28
R v Thomas
Touching clothes is a battery while wearing them
7 of 28
Continuing Act
Fagan v MPC - battery can be through continuing act - only gets mens rea during actus reus
8 of 28
Indirect Act
Force is applied without touch (e.g. booby trap) (DPP v K)
9 of 28
Omissons
Can be a battery if there was a duty to act (DPP v K)
10 of 28
Unlawful Force
Opposite of lawful force
11 of 28
Mens Rea
Intention or recklessess
12 of 28
s.47 ABH Definition
whosovers shall be convicted of any assault occasioning ABH shall be liable to imprisonment for 5 years. No definition of ABH or assault
13 of 28
Assault
Must be an assault or battery that caused ABH
14 of 28
ABH
Chan Fook - just normal words. Actual = more than trivial injury. Harm = injury hurt or damage
15 of 28
R(T) v DPP
Loss of conciousness is ABH
16 of 28
DPP v Smith(Michael)
Cutting off someone's ponytail was ABH
17 of 28
Psychiatric Injury
Chan Fook - is ABH but doesn't include mere emotions. Confirmed in Burstow
18 of 28
Mens Rea
Mens rea for assault/battery. No need for D to intend or be reckless if ABH is caused (Roberts) Confirmed by HL in Parmenter/Savage
19 of 28
s.20 Definition
Malicously wound or inflict any grievous bodily harm
20 of 28
Wound
A cut or break in the continuty of the whole skin. Internal bleeding is not enough (JCC v Eisenhower/Wood)
21 of 28
GBH
DPP v Smith - really serious harm Saunders - serious harm Bollom - severity of injuries assessed accoring to age and health Burstow - psychiatric injury Dica - HIV
22 of 28
Mens Rea
"Maliciously" Cunningham - it means intention or recklessness Parmenter - confirmed this. only need to intended/be reckless to cause some harm
23 of 28
s.18 Definition
Unlwfully and maliciously wound or cause GBH to any person with intent to do some GBH or with intent to resist or prevent arrest.
24 of 28
Wound and GBH
Same as s.20
25 of 28
Mens Rea
Intended GBH or intended to resist arrest
26 of 28
Intend GBH
Specific intent crime, recklessness is not enough. Causes issues with oblique intent (Moloney/Matthews&Alleyne/Nedrick/Woolin)
27 of 28
Resisting or Preventing Arrest
Level of intention required if lower. Must prove D intended to resist/prevent arrest but only needs to intend or be reckless to cause some harm/injury (Morrsion)
28 of 28

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Act

Back

Requires some act or words, omission is not enough. Can be verbal or written (Ireland/Constanza)

Card 3

Front

Apprehend Immediate Unlawful Force

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Unlawful Force

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Mens Rea

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Law of Tort resources »