Back to quiz

6. Which case says that psychiatric harm is sufficient?

  • Thabo-meli
  • T v DPP
  • Chan-Fook
  • Church

7. What was said in Collins and Wilcock?

  • Unlawful force can be the smallest of touches.
  • Touching a person's clothing is sufficient
  • Force can be indirect.
  • The emphasis is on what the V thought was going to happen.

8. Who defined assault?

  • Fagan
  • Burstow
  • Logdon
  • Ireland

9. What is ABH defined as and in what case?

  • Lots of smaller injuries taken together as a whole - Brown v Stratton
  • Break in the whole of the skin - JCC v Eisenhower.
  • Any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health and comfort of the V - Miller
  • Really serious harm - DPP v Smith

10. What was said in Tuberville v Savage?

  • Doing nothing is sufficient for an assault.
  • Words can negate an assault.
  • Words alone are sufficient for an assault
  • Occasioning mean causation

11. What is the mens rea for S20?

  • Intention to cause harm - Mowatt
  • Intention or recklessness to cause some harm - Mowatt
  • Intention to apply force on another - Savage
  • Intention to cause GBH - Venna

12. What case said that a disease can be GBH?

  • Dica
  • Bollom
  • Collins v Wilcock
  • Church

13. What was said in Savage;Parmenter?

  • There must be intention as to some harm.
  • The mens rea for S47 is intentionally or recklessly causing GBH.
  • There is no additional mens rea
  • There must be an assault or batter for S47.

14. What was said in R v Thomas?

  • Force can be indirect.
  • Unlawful touching can be the smallest of touches.
  • Touching someone's clothes is battery.
  • There is implied consent in normal social situations.

15. What is wounding and what case states this?

  • A cut or break in the continuity of the whole skin - JCC v Eisenhower
  • Momentary loss of consciousness - T v DPP
  • Really serious harm - DPP v Smith
  • Any hurt or injury that interferes with the comfort of the V - Miller

16. Who defined battery?

  • Haystead
  • Fagan
  • Ireland;Burstow
  • Collins v Wilcock

17. What is the mens rea for S18?

  • With intention to kill.
  • Intention or recklessness as to cause harm
  • Intention to cause GBH.
  • Intention to cause the victim to apprehend

18. What was said in Ireland?

  • Words can negate an assault.
  • Actions alone are sufficient for assault.
  • Immediate does not mean instantaneous.
  • Assault can be indirect

19. What was said in Haystead?

  • Force can be indirect.
  • Doing nothing is sufficient
  • Touching someone's clothes can be battery
  • Psychiatric harm is sufficient

20. What is the mens rea for battery and the case that established it?

  • Intentionally causing the victim to apprehend immediate and unlawful violence - Savage.
  • Intentionally or recklessly applying unlawful force on to another - Venna
  • Intentionally or recklessly applying unlawful force on another - Mowatt.
  • Intentionally applying force on another - Venna.