Skip to content
Back to quiz
6. Which case says that psychiatric harm is sufficient?
- Thabo-meli
- T v DPP
- Chan-Fook
- Church
7. What was said in Collins and Wilcock?
- Unlawful force can be the smallest of touches.
- Touching a person's clothing is sufficient
- Force can be indirect.
- The emphasis is on what the V thought was going to happen.
8. Who defined assault?
- Fagan
- Burstow
- Logdon
- Ireland
9. What is ABH defined as and in what case?
- Lots of smaller injuries taken together as a whole - Brown v Stratton
- Break in the whole of the skin - JCC v Eisenhower.
- Any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health and comfort of the V - Miller
- Really serious harm - DPP v Smith
10. What was said in Tuberville v Savage?
- Doing nothing is sufficient for an assault.
- Words can negate an assault.
- Words alone are sufficient for an assault
- Occasioning mean causation
11. What is the mens rea for S20?
- Intention to cause harm - Mowatt
- Intention or recklessness to cause some harm - Mowatt
- Intention to apply force on another - Savage
- Intention to cause GBH - Venna
12. What case said that a disease can be GBH?
- Dica
- Bollom
- Collins v Wilcock
- Church
13. What was said in Savage;Parmenter?
- There must be intention as to some harm.
- The mens rea for S47 is intentionally or recklessly causing GBH.
- There is no additional mens rea
- There must be an assault or batter for S47.
14. What was said in R v Thomas?
- Force can be indirect.
- Unlawful touching can be the smallest of touches.
- Touching someone's clothes is battery.
- There is implied consent in normal social situations.
15. What is wounding and what case states this?
- A cut or break in the continuity of the whole skin - JCC v Eisenhower
- Momentary loss of consciousness - T v DPP
- Really serious harm - DPP v Smith
- Any hurt or injury that interferes with the comfort of the V - Miller
16. Who defined battery?
- Haystead
- Fagan
- Ireland;Burstow
- Collins v Wilcock
17. What is the mens rea for S18?
- With intention to kill.
- Intention or recklessness as to cause harm
- Intention to cause GBH.
- Intention to cause the victim to apprehend
18. What was said in Ireland?
- Words can negate an assault.
- Actions alone are sufficient for assault.
- Immediate does not mean instantaneous.
- Assault can be indirect
19. What was said in Haystead?
- Force can be indirect.
- Doing nothing is sufficient
- Touching someone's clothes can be battery
- Psychiatric harm is sufficient
20. What is the mens rea for battery and the case that established it?
- Intentionally causing the victim to apprehend immediate and unlawful violence - Savage.
- Intentionally or recklessly applying unlawful force on to another - Venna
- Intentionally or recklessly applying unlawful force on another - Mowatt.
- Intentionally applying force on another - Venna.