Other questions in this quiz

2. Which case states that; the fear of possibility of immediate force is enough for an assault?

  • R v Venna
  • Smith v Chief Superintendent of Woking Police Station
  • Tuberville v Savage
  • R v Bollom

3. Which is the point of law from Tuberville V Savage?

  • Words can cancel an assault
  • No need for contact for an assault
  • Possibility of force is enough
  • Confirmed the definition of assualt

4. Which is the definition of assault?

  • To intentionally or recklessly cause the fear of another.
  • To intentionally or recklessly cause the apprehension of immediate force.
  • The intentional or reckless application of unlawful force.
  • To intentionally cause the apprehension of immediate force.

5. Which is the mens rea of assault?

  • To foresee that some harm might occur
  • Cunningham Recklessness
  • Intention and/or Cunningham Recklessness
  • Direct Intent

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »