Other questions in this quiz

2. What happened in DERRY V PEEK?

  • Involved health food franchises
  • Agreement to prevent C from gambling, breached duty but failed because C could've bet somewhere else.
  • D said they had a licence to runs trams, C sued when they invested and lost money when the licences weren't granted. D not liable.
  • Investor asked insurance company for advice on an investment and sued for the negligent advice given. D not liable.

3. Special skill, reasonable reliance and actual/constructive knowledge are requirements of what?

  • Duty of care
  • 'Special relationship'
  • Breach of duty

4. LORD DENNING gave a dissenting judgment in CANDLER saying what?

  • A duty of care is owed when the representor knew his statement would be showed and when the representor knew his statement would be relied on
  • Described a 'special relationship' as 'equivalent to contract'

5. Duty of care owed for pure economic loss established in what case?

  • ESSO PETROLEUM V MARDON
  • GORHAM V BT AND OTHERS
  • HEDLEY BRYNE V HELLER
  • DERRY V PEEK

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Law of Tort resources »