Other questions in this quiz

2. What happened in DERRY V PEEK?

  • Involved health food franchises
  • Agreement to prevent C from gambling, breached duty but failed because C could've bet somewhere else.
  • D said they had a licence to runs trams, C sued when they invested and lost money when the licences weren't granted. D not liable.
  • Investor asked insurance company for advice on an investment and sued for the negligent advice given. D not liable.

3. Special skill, reasonable reliance and actual/constructive knowledge are requirements of what?

  • 'Special relationship'
  • Breach of duty
  • Duty of care

4. What is the case to explain the difference between consequential economic loss and pure economic loss?

  • CHAUDHRY V PRABHAKER
  • DERRY V PEEK
  • SPARTAN STEEL V MARTIN
  • CAPARO V DICKMAN

5. Duty of care owed for pure economic loss established in what case?

  • HEDLEY BRYNE V HELLER
  • GORHAM V BT AND OTHERS
  • DERRY V PEEK
  • ESSO PETROLEUM V MARDON

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Law of Tort resources »