the neighbour principle. no contract but D still pwe C a duty of care
1 of 6
Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92
See accident from 45 meters away. no duty of care. C was too far removed from events in time to reasonably be owed any duty by D
2 of 6
Haley v London Electricity Board [1964] 3 All ER 185
C a blind man fell into a hole dug by D. held that the number of unaccompanied blind pedestrians using London streets was such that the Ds should of considered the blind. placed D under a duty to take adequate precautions
3 of 6
Anns v London Borough of Merton [1978] AC 728
C
4 of 6
Governors of the Peabody Fund v Sir Lindsay Parkinson Ltd [1984] 3 All ER 529 (HL)
C
5 of 6
Leigh and Sullivan Ltd v Aliakmon Shipping Co. Ltd [1986] 2 All ER 145 (HL)
C
6 of 6
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
See accident from 45 meters away. no duty of care. C was too far removed from events in time to reasonably be owed any duty by D
Back
Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92
Card 3
Front
C a blind man fell into a hole dug by D. held that the number of unaccompanied blind pedestrians using London streets was such that the Ds should of considered the blind. placed D under a duty to take adequate precautions
Comments
No comments have yet been made