White- risk of killed my dose having never had it before DT- when had before but dif envi ST- drug before in same envi - If had before in same envi in risk of second dose killing you is radically reduced
1 of 12
Gutierrez-Cebollada et al., (1994)
likely somewhere different to normal when OD- unusual OD 52% non OD 0%, usual OD 48% non OD 100%
2 of 12
Solomon and Corbit
stimulus substitution vs opponent processes
3 of 12
Siegel (1977):
proposed conditioned withdrawal as a mechanism to account for relapse into drug taking
4 of 12
Stewart et al. (1984):
evidence for conditioned incentive effects- a little of what you want makes you want more
5 of 12
Hebb effect
cf. peanuts or an aperetif Stewart’s incentive effects can only work when drugs are actually available? Want to kick start your appetite
6 of 12
Solomon & Corbit, 1974
Both kinds of reaction seen successively
7 of 12
Church et al.,1966
reaction and counter-reaction to shock- HR after shock get reaction and counter reaction increase then decrease and gradual incline again
8 of 12
Siegel & Kim (2000):
overdose in patient switched from oral morphine to skin patch substitute
9 of 12
Zador (1999):
‘ingesting heroin in an unusual or unfamiliar setting is not currently publicized as a risk’
10 of 12
Siegel & Ramos, 2002
Spontaneous recovery – best to use widely spaced extinction trials to minimize Context effects – extinction as CS-no-US associations (thus context-specific) Occasion setting role of context – occasion setters don’t extinguish when presented on own
11 of 12
...
ineffective exposure therapy maybe working with wrong cue
12 of 12
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Gutierrez-Cebollada et al., (1994)
Back
likely somewhere different to normal when OD- unusual OD 52% non OD 0%, usual OD 48% non OD 100%
Comments
No comments have yet been made