Milgram Original Study + Evaluation

?
  • Created by: mimipopx
  • Created on: 16-04-16 10:04
When was Milgrams original study?
1963
1 of 26
What was the aim of the original study?
The aim of the experiment was to investigate what level of obedience would be shown when participants were told by an authority figure to administer electric shocks to another person.
2 of 26
Why was Milgrams study carried out?
He wanted to test the 'germans are different' hypothesis and thought that anybody would be obedient to do so when required by an authority figure
3 of 26
Participants?
40 males between 20 and 50years old, from around Yale University area.
4 of 26
How were participants gained?
responding to a newspaper and direct mail advertisement. They were paid $4.50 for their participation
5 of 26
Where did the experiment take place?
Yale University
6 of 26
Who was Mr Wallace?
a confederate who played the part of the learner
7 of 26
What were particpants told the aim was?
to investigate the effects of punishment on learning .
8 of 26
What was the particpant given before they started?
a sample shock of 45 volts
9 of 26
What was the task?
read a series of word pairs to the learner, then they had to match them
10 of 26
If the learner got the pairing wrong?
participant had to tell the learner the correct answer and then the level of punishment that they were going to give them.
11 of 26
What was one control?
The learner gives a predetermined set of responses to the word pair test, based on a schedule of approximately three wrong answers to one correct answer.
12 of 26
Some of the responses from the learner?
moans/groans, requests to be excused from experiment, yelled ‘Let me out! My heart’s bothering me.’
13 of 26
What were used if the learner did not want to continue? with examples
Verbal Prods; Prod 1: "Please continue” or “Please go on” ; Prod 2: “ The experi ment requires that you continue” ; Prod 3: “ It is absolut ely essential that you continue” ; Prod 4: “ You have no other choice, you must go on”
14 of 26
After the experiment?
participants were thoroughly debriefed using open - ended questions, reunited with the victim to show them that the victim was not harmed
15 of 26
How many ppts went to 300 volts?
All 40, after this point 5 refused to continue
16 of 26
How many ppts went to the full 450 volts?
65% (26) the other 35% dropped out after 300 volts
17 of 26
What signs did ppts show during the expt?
signs of nervousness and tension. Participants sweated, trembled, stuttered, bit their lips, groaned, dug fingernails into their flesh, even seizures
18 of 26
Conclusion?
Social influence is strong and people obey orders even when this causes them distress. It was not thought that people would obey and such obedience is surprising.
19 of 26
What were some features which milgram thought created obedience?
prestigious Yale University lent the study and procedure credibility and respect, worthy purpose, The participant felt obligated- especially due to pay, The participants had been *** ured that the shocks were ‘painful but not dangerous
20 of 26
What percentage of participants surveyed later said they were "glad" or "very glad" to have participated?
84%
21 of 26
Generalisability
No- only 40 males from one area
22 of 26
Reliaibilty
Yes- high controls (verbal prods, responses from learner) easily, was repeated replicable
23 of 26
Application to Real Life
YEs- My Lai, general army situations, group crime in courts
24 of 26
Validity
No- ecological - setting may have altered results Yes- experimental -the ppts believed it was real, no moral strain
25 of 26
Ethics
No- no right to withdraw, no informed consent, distress caused Yes- debriefed, many said they were happy to take part
26 of 26

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

What was the aim of the original study?

Back

The aim of the experiment was to investigate what level of obedience would be shown when participants were told by an authority figure to administer electric shocks to another person.

Card 3

Front

Why was Milgrams study carried out?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Participants?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

How were participants gained?

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Social Psychology resources »