Milgram (1963 study)

HideShow resource information
What was the aim of Milgram's study?
To see if normal people would follow orders and give a potentially harmful electric shock to an innocent person
1 of 13
What was the sample?
40 males aged 20-60
2 of 13
What were the results?
100% went up to 300V, 14 stopped up to 375V but the 65% left went all the way
3 of 13
What was the conclusion drawn from the study?
We are socialised to recognise authority figures and obey their orders, people find it harder to obey people of power
4 of 13
Generaliseability
Sample wasn't diverse so it can't be generalised, there were no females so it lacked population validity
5 of 13
Reliability
It was a lab experiment, good controls so it is reliable, replicable and credible
6 of 13
Application
Can explain why people obey, for example soldiers in Abu Graib who committed horrible inhumane things said that they were "just following orders"
7 of 13
Validity
It was in a lab setting so it lacked ecological validity and also lacked population validity due to the sample, however Hoflings study with doctors and nurses backs up the results
8 of 13
Ethics
Very unethical because it caused the participants psychological stress which isn't protecting them from psychological harm, they showed physical signs of being stressed (laughing, fiddling) thus making it unethical
9 of 13
Experiment 7
Telephonic instructions- Looked at proximity of experimenter, obedience levels dropped to 22.5% and some lied to the experimenter about increasing the voltage but continued to obey when he came back in
10 of 13
Experiment 10
Run down office block- Looked at effect of setting, same experiment in run down offices, many questioned the credentials of the place, obedience dropped to 48%
11 of 13
Experiment 13
Ordinary man gives instructions- Looked at effect of status, the participant thought that the experimenter and the learner were both participants as well, yet they were confess, obedience dropped to 20%
12 of 13
Give 4 factors which increase obedience
1) Closer proximity with experimenter, 2) Higher status of authority figure, 3) Level of personal responsibility, 4) If they undergo gradual commitment
13 of 13

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

What was the sample?

Back

40 males aged 20-60

Card 3

Front

What were the results?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

What was the conclusion drawn from the study?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Generaliseability

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Obedience resources »