Max's Legal Refresher - Contract Law (I)
- Created by: max_lees23
- Created on: 03-04-20 13:19
Other questions in this quiz
2. Which are examples of offers (rather than invitations to treat)?
- Requests for tender or calls for bids in auction with reserve.
- Display of goods in self-service shop (Boots), or shop window (Fischer)
- Tenders, auction bids or auctions without reserve, i.e. unilateral promise to sell to highest bidder (Barry v Davies)
- Adverts in normal circumstances. (Partridge)
3. Which is NOT true regarding good consideration?
- Must be more than a condition (Cheshire Fifoot & Furmston)
- Social promise only if relinquishing legal rights (White; Hamer)
- Must be adequate, i.e. equivalent economic value to the value of the promise (Chappell)
- Must be sufficient but need not be adequate; nominal economic value is fine (Chappell)
4. Which one is NOT true regarding revocation of offers?
- Notice of offer revocation effective on receipt if reasonable, eg. normal business hours (The Brimnes)
- Offer can be revoked up until acceptance. Promise to keep offer open until given date generally not binding (Routledge)
- Notice of offer revocation must be given directly not by 3P (Dickinson v Dodds)
- Offer revocation must be communicated & received (Byrne & Co)
5. Definition of "promissory estoppel"?
- An equitable remedy in which a court orders a party to perform, or refrain from performing, a particular act (PLC)
- The precluding of a party, in certain circumstances, from proving in litigation particular facts or matters which, if proved, would assist him to succeed as plaintiff [now claimant] or defendant in an action (Thoday v Thoday)
- If one party makes promise to forgo a legal right, and other acts on it, the other has a defence to any claim by the promisor which is inconsistent with that promise (High Trees)
- Equitable remedy whereby contract is set aside and parties returned to pre-contract positions (PLC)
Comments
No comments have yet been made