1. Who agrees with realists that 'rules are not always conclusive' but then says that 'some rules can have an agreed upon meaning'?
- Oliver Wendell-Holmes
1 of 15
Other questions in this quiz
2. According to Oliver Wendell-Holmes, who must we look at the law as?
- The bad man
- The good man
- The law-maker
- The moral man
3. What is Hart's major criticism of Llewellyn's theory?
- Eternal factors are explanations for judicial decision-making
- It does not fit our legal practices
- It leaves out the normativity of law as being guides to conduct
- Precedents can be interpreted differently
4. Why does Jerome Frank believe that even if rules are clear, outcomes in cases will always be different?
- Judges often disregard rules
- The findings of judges cannot be predicted
- Rules do not determine the outcome of a case
- The rules may be clear but not be moral
5. According to Dworkin, where there is 'confusion about a statute or precedent, there are...?'
- Various methods of interpretation open to the judges
- Right and wrong ways to read them
- No rules for defining them
- Never any conclusive answers