LAW RESIT REVISION 4.0 / 5 based on 2 ratings ? LawStatutory interpretationASAQA Created by: Callie FitzgeraldCreated on: 09-04-13 16:04 FISHER V BELL YEAR- 1960 LITERAL RULE THE KNIFE WAS NOT 'OFFERED FOR SALE' OFFENSIVE WEAPONS ACT 1959 1 of 10 HEYDONS CASE YEAR- 1583 ESTABLISHED THE MISCHIEF RULE (REVISE 4 STEPS IN APPLYING MR) 2 of 10 LONDON AND NORTHERN EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY V BERRIMAN YEAR- 1946 MAINTAINING NOT 'RELAYING OR REPAIRING' LITERAL RULE 3 of 10 POWELL V KEMPTON PARK RACECOURSE YEAR- 1899 WAS NOT "HOUSE OFFICE ROOM OR OTHER PLACE" BETTING ACT 1853 EJUSDEM GENERIS RULE- THE RACECOURSE WAS OUTSIDE 4 of 10 ROYAL COLLEGE OF NURSING V DHSS YEAR- 1981 MISCHIEF RULE THE ABORTION ACT 1967- ABORTIONS HAD TO BE CARRIED OUT BY A 'REGISTERED MEDICAL PRACTITIONER' THE NURSE WAS CLASSED AS 'RMP' 5 of 10 SMITH V HUGHES YEAR- 1960 PROSTITUTES ON A BALCONY STREET OFFENCES ACT 1959- "STREET OR PUBLIC PLACE" MISCHIEF RULE- FOLLOWED ACTS INTENTIONS 6 of 10 TEMPEST V KILNER YEAR- 1846 EXPRESSIO UNIUS EXCLUSIO ALTERIUS "GOODS, WARES, AND MERCHANDISE" DID NOT INCLUDE STOCKS AND SHARES STATUTE OF FRAUDS 1677 7 of 10 WHITLEY V CHAPPELL YEAR- 1868 "IT IS ILLEGAL TO IMPERSONATE ANY PERSON ENTITLED TO VOTE" D WAS ACQUITTED BECAUSE DEAD PERSON WAS NOT ENTITLED TO VOTE LITERAL RULE 8 of 10 R V ALLEN YEAR- GOLDEN RULE TWO MEANINGS OF THE WORD "MARRY" OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT S57 1861 9 of 10 RE SIGSWORTH YEAR- 1935 APPLIED GOLDEN RULE TO AVOID REPUGNANT SITUATION OF SON INHERITING MOTHERS PROPERTY 10 of 10
Comments
No comments have yet been made