Key Studies - Capacity 0.0 / 5 ? LawContract lawA2/A-levelCIE Created by: NiamhEgyptCreated on: 24-09-19 15:01 Chapple v Cooper (1844) A young widow (minor) was successfully sued for payment of her husbands's funeral as this was necessart. 1 of 7 Nash v Inman (1908) A tailor unsuccessfully sued a minor as the clothes were not deemed necessary. 2 of 7 Clements v London and North Western Railway Company (1894) A minor was bound by the employer's scheme as it was beneficial to him. 3 of 7 De Francesco v Barnum (1890) A monor was not bound under the terms of her apprenticeship. 4 of 7 Doyle v White City Stadium Ltd (1935) The contract was binding as it encouraged the minor to be a clean and proficient boxer, which was to his advantage. 5 of 7 Edwards v Carter (1893) A man could not repudiate a marriage settlement drawn up while he was a minor, as it was too late. 6 of 7 Steinberg v Scala (Leeds) Ltd (1923) A minor could repudiate the contract and thus not have to pay the second instalment, but she could not recover the sums paid in the first instalment. 7 of 7
Comments
No comments have yet been made