Intoxication defence 0.0 / 5 ? LawCriminal lawA2/A-levelAQA Created by: georgiaball10Created on: 07-05-16 14:18 254316 Across 1. Voluntary - specific intent - Which case demonstrates that the key issue is whether D was so intoxicated he could not form necessary mens rea (6) 4. Involuntary - Which case demonstrates that not realising the strength of the alcohol is classed as voluntary? (5) 5. voluntary - Which case demonstrates it is only a defence to specific intent if D could not form MR? (7, 3, 5) 6. Involuntary - Which case demonstrates that if it could be shown that the D still had the necessary mens rea, they are guilty? (8) Down 2. voluntary - basic intent - Which case demonstrates becoming voluntarily intoxicated is a reckless course of conduct & therefore MR element is established for basic intent? (8) 3. Involuntary - Which case demonstrates that taking non dangerous drug in reckless way is voluntary and in a non reckless way is involuntary? (1, 1, 6)
Comments
No comments have yet been made