Interpersonal decision making

?
  • Created by: india467
  • Created on: 17-04-18 20:22
Interpersonal decision aming involves situations where individuals must anticipate what others will do and predict what they will infer from their own actions.
Camerer (2011)
1 of 17
Psychologists are interested because behavioural economists have noted that individuals often make "irrational" decisions.
Rabin (1993)
2 of 17
Game theory was developed to gain insight into how and why we punish others.
Auman (2017)
3 of 17
Ultimatum Game. Player has 10. If offer is accepted, both gain. If not, both loose.
Guth et al (1982)
4 of 17
Ultimatum game behaviour observed in twins. Correlation of 0.39 in MZ twins, no correlation in DZ.. Though 42% of variance could be attributed to genetic factors.
Wallace et al (2007)
5 of 17
Males who rejected £5 had significantly higher testosterone than those who accepted.
Burnham (2007)
6 of 17
Artificially raising men's testosterone caused them to only accept higher offers.
Zak et al (2009)
7 of 17
Testosterone levels are genetically determined in both genders.
Harris et al (1998)
8 of 17
Rejection of unfair offers in ultimatum game correlated with straightforwardness and trust subscales of agreeableness.
Takahashi (2012) (1)
9 of 17
Found agreeableness subscales correlated with inherited levels of serotonin transport in Dorsal Raphe Nucleus.
Takahashi (2012) (2)
10 of 17
The dictator game.
Mikula (1972)
11 of 17
Even though economists say dictator should not give money, they give 28% (variable) with only 40% not giving anything.
Engel (2014)
12 of 17
People with long/long allele for vassopressin 1a receptor gave most, followed by long/short then short/short.
Knafo et al (2008)
13 of 17
rs104778 mutation which codes for oxytocin predicted less generosity across 2 games when polymorphic.
Israel et al (2009)
14 of 17
BAS correlated with higher amounts on ultimatum game and lower on dictator. Reward maximising.
Scheres and Sanfey (2006)
15 of 17
TMS, disrupted right PFC during ultimatum. Accepted low offers even though reported as unfair.
Knoch et al (2006)
16 of 17
Found grey matter volume in right PFC is highly heritable.
Gray and Thompson (2004)
17 of 17

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Psychologists are interested because behavioural economists have noted that individuals often make "irrational" decisions.

Back

Rabin (1993)

Card 3

Front

Game theory was developed to gain insight into how and why we punish others.

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Ultimatum Game. Player has 10. If offer is accepted, both gain. If not, both loose.

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Ultimatum game behaviour observed in twins. Correlation of 0.39 in MZ twins, no correlation in DZ.. Though 42% of variance could be attributed to genetic factors.

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Individual Differences resources »