Interactionist Explanations of Crime and Deviance 0.0 / 5 ? SociologyCrime and devianceA2/A-levelAQA Created by: steeeephtaylorCreated on: 31-05-15 12:21 Who said that there is no such thing as a deviant act because no act is inherently criminal or deviant in itself, only when it is labelled as such. Howard Becker 1 of 10 What is the term for something that is made up of groups such as the police, the judiciary, social workers and probation workers? Agents of social control 2 of 10 What do interactionists believe deviance is due to? Labelling 3 of 10 Who stated the idea of primary and secondary deviance? Edwin Lemert 4 of 10 what is secondary deviance the result of? Societal reaction 5 of 10 What is the term for when society interprets all actions and motives in the context of the label? Master status 6 of 10 What is the consequence of treating someone as a deviant? Self-fulfilling prophecy 7 of 10 Who says that a deviant is simply someone to whom a label has been successfully applied to? Becker 8 of 10 What does Becker say the behaviour of the less powerful is subjected to? Greater surveillance 9 of 10 Who argues that the labelling theory is guilty of over-romanticising deviance and blaming the agencies of social control for causing crime? Left Realists 10 of 10
Comments
No comments have yet been made