In which case was it held that a defect of reason means that the Defendants powers of reasoning are impaired
Clarke
3 of 11
Which case held ‘The condition of the brain is irrelevant and so is the question whether the condition of the mind is curable or incurable, transitory or permanent’.
Kemp
4 of 11
How many elements are there to this defence?
Three
5 of 11
Which case held: ‘It could be organic, as in epilepsy, or functional.’
Sullivan
6 of 11
In which case was it held that 'wrong' meant 'legally wrong'?
Windle
7 of 11
In which case was diabetes regarded as an internal cause?
Hennessy
8 of 11
‘A complete loss of voluntary control that was not caused by what the person could reasonably foresee and is not a self-induced incapacity or one that was a result of a disease of the mind’.
Smallshire
9 of 11
Which case held There must be a ‘total destruction of voluntary control’.
AGs Reference 2
10 of 11
What distinguishes automatism from insanity?
External Factor
11 of 11
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
What is the first element?
Back
Defect of reason
Card 3
Front
In which case was it held that a defect of reason means that the Defendants powers of reasoning are impaired
Back
Card 4
Front
Which case held ‘The condition of the brain is irrelevant and so is the question whether the condition of the mind is curable or incurable, transitory or permanent’.
Comments
No comments have yet been made