Insanity and Automatism 0.0 / 5 ? LawDefenceA2/A-levelAQA Created by: ritateixeira7Created on: 15-12-14 16:20 91032154687 Across 1. What is the first element? (6, 2, 6) 6. In which case was it held that 'wrong' meant 'legally wrong'? (6) 7. What is the Leading case? (9) 8. In which case was diabetes regarded as an internal cause? (8) 10. What distinguishes automatism from insanity? (8, 6) Down 2. Which case held ‘The condition of the brain is irrelevant and so is the question whether the condition of the mind is curable or incurable, transitory or permanent’. (4) 3. How many elements are there to this defence? (5) 4. Which case held: ‘It could be organic, as in epilepsy, or functional.’ (8) 5. In which case was it held that a defect of reason means that the Defendants powers of reasoning are impaired (6) 9. ‘A complete loss of voluntary control that was not caused by what the person could reasonably foresee and is not a self-induced incapacity or one that was a result of a disease of the mind’. (10)
Comments
No comments have yet been made