Lord Nicholls: Parl recognises that the courts cannot achieve Convn compliance in all cases – tyo do otherwise would be to cross the const’l boundary s 3 seeks to demarcate and preserve
1 of 12
Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza (2004)
HL could see no legit justification for this diff in treatment and reinterpreted Rent Act provn so as to give equal rights to all couples
2 of 12
Harrow LBC v Qazi (2004)
Art 8 = concerned with rights to privacy and does not e.g. prevent eveiction of an in by an owner of land
3 of 12
Chapman v UK (2001)
Art 8 does not require the state to offer security of tenure to a surviving relative of a tenant nor does it offer a right to be provided with a home
4 of 12
Kay v Lambeth LBC (2006)
Rights given under domestic law cannot be defeated simply by some pleading of an ind’s personal plight
5 of 12
National Westminster Bank v Malhan (2004)
Art 8 does not prevent overreaching of a beneficial interest by a mortgagee
6 of 12
HRA 1998, s 3
Domestic legn must be interpreted so far as it is possible to do so in a fashion that is compatible with the Convn rights
7 of 12
HRA 1998, s 4
Power of dec of incompatibility
8 of 12
HRA 1998, Art 1, Protocol 1
Contains a guarantee of prop rights (i.e. substantive rights) by offering: freedom from arbitrary deprivation of possns; freedom from unjustified controls on use of prop; peaceful enjoyment of possns
9 of 12
HRA 1998, Art 6
Offers a right to a fair trial of e.g. property disputes
10 of 12
HRA 1998, Art 8
Gives a right to respect for a person’s home and family life
11 of 12
HRA 1998, Art 14
Offers freedom from discrimination in the exercise of Convention rights
12 of 12
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
HL could see no legit justification for this diff in treatment and reinterpreted Rent Act provn so as to give equal rights to all couples
Back
Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza (2004)
Card 3
Front
Art 8 = concerned with rights to privacy and does not e.g. prevent eveiction of an in by an owner of land
Back
Card 4
Front
Art 8 does not require the state to offer security of tenure to a surviving relative of a tenant nor does it offer a right to be provided with a home
Back
Card 5
Front
Rights given under domestic law cannot be defeated simply by some pleading of an ind’s personal plight
Comments
No comments have yet been made