1. Green criminologists (White 2008) state that a crime is any action that harms the environmentand/or the human and non-human animals within it, even if no laws are broken.
1 of 13
Other questions in this quiz
2. Which of the following is a true example of criticism that could be applied to green criminology?
- It hasn't suggested 2 views of harm.
- It has boundaries that are hard to deefine. It's broad. Naming things as wrong isn't factual, but based on opinions, norms or values.
- It is a waste of time to try and protect the environment.
- The crimionolgy isn't transgressive, so therefore shouldn't be valid.
3. Green criminology is different from traditional criminology, because...
- Green is more accepted by the media.
- Green takes a more radical approach.
- Traditional doesn't care about the environment.
- Traditional is seen as outdated.
4. 'Society is a global risk society. An increase in technology generates manufactured risks that can harm the environment/cause global warming' - who argued this point?
- South (2008)
- White (2008)
- Beck (1992)
- Becker (1932)
5. The view that 'humans and the environment are interdependent, so they can hurt each other' is...