1. Situ and Emmons (2000) define environmental crime as...
- Harmless and based on a person's opinion.
- An unauthorised act that violates the law.
- A way in which people rebel.
- Any action that puts the environment at risk.
1 of 13
Other questions in this quiz
2. Traditional criminologists argue that an action is only a crime when...
- Traditional members of society say it is.
- A person has broken the law.
- The media say it is.
- A person discriminates the environment.
3. Green criminology is different from traditional criminology, because...
- Green is more accepted by the media.
- Traditional is seen as outdated.
- Green takes a more radical approach.
- Traditional doesn't care about the environment.
4. Which of the following is a true example of criticism that could be applied to green criminology?
- The crimionolgy isn't transgressive, so therefore shouldn't be valid.
- It is a waste of time to try and protect the environment.
- It has boundaries that are hard to deefine. It's broad. Naming things as wrong isn't factual, but based on opinions, norms or values.
- It hasn't suggested 2 views of harm.
5. Who suggested the idea of primary and secondary environmental crimes?
- White (2008)
- South (2008)
- Tomkins (1998)
- Lewes (2001)
Similar Sociology resources: