Other questions in this quiz

2. White (2008) has two views of harm:

  • Anthropocentric and Ecocentic
  • Race and Interdependency
  • Humanocentric and Ecocentric
  • Ethnocentric and Environmocentric

3. Situ and Emmons (2000) define environmental crime as...

  • A way in which people rebel.
  • An unauthorised act that violates the law.
  • Any action that puts the environment at risk.
  • Harmless and based on a person's opinion.

4. Which of the following is a true example of criticism that could be applied to green criminology?

  • The crimionolgy isn't transgressive, so therefore shouldn't be valid.
  • It is a waste of time to try and protect the environment.
  • It has boundaries that are hard to deefine. It's broad. Naming things as wrong isn't factual, but based on opinions, norms or values.
  • It hasn't suggested 2 views of harm.

5. Green criminologists (White 2008) state that a crime is any action that harms the environmentand/or the human and non-human animals within it, even if no laws are broken.

  • True
  • False


No comments have yet been made

Similar Sociology resources:

See all Sociology resources »See all Crime and deviance resources »