General Defences

?
Leading case for insanity
M'Naghten
1 of 7
Consent may be implied regarding the jostling's of everyday life
Wilson & Pringle
2 of 7
Leading case for consent in contact sports
Barnes
3 of 7
Case deciding that if Ds automatic state was self induced but he had no mens rea, that he could still use the defence in specific intent offences
Bailey
4 of 7
Case deciding that police protection may not always be effective when considering the defence of Duress
Hudson & Taylor
5 of 7
In the Graham test for duress, who is D compared to when considering if they would have acted in the same way?
A person of sober and reasonable firmness
6 of 7
Case deciding the wrong mean s legally wrong not morally wrong when thinking about the nature and quality of an act in the defence of insanity
Windle
7 of 7

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Consent may be implied regarding the jostling's of everyday life

Back

Wilson & Pringle

Card 3

Front

Leading case for consent in contact sports

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Case deciding that if Ds automatic state was self induced but he had no mens rea, that he could still use the defence in specific intent offences

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Case deciding that police protection may not always be effective when considering the defence of Duress

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »