Gardner and Gardner 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyCore studiesASAQA Created by: francesca_321Created on: 17-02-15 15:29 What is the first piece of evidence to support Gardner and Gardner? Premack 1 of 17 What was the name of the chimp in Premack's study? Sarah 2 of 17 What could sarah do? use and string together 130 words eg. sarah+give+apple+Mary using coloured shapes for words 3 of 17 How does Premack's study support G and G? Sarah and Washoe appeared to be able to use human words to communicate. 4 of 17 How was Washoe like Sarah? she learned lots of words later in life(250) and was able to string them together in short sentences 5 of 17 What could Kanzi do? the same with the use of a lexigram 6 of 17 How was G and G an improvement on Premack's study? used ALS which is used by real humans therefore stronger in validity 7 of 17 What evidence challenges Gardner and Gardner study? Terrace 8 of 17 How did he argue against the study? After training his chimp Nim Chimpsky with ALS he argued that Washoe and Nim were not using human language 9 of 17 What was evidence of this? close analysis of films of Washoe and Nim, it lead to the finding that they were just imitating their trainers. 10 of 17 How could you argue it is impossible to compare the findings of the case studies? they had such wide indivual differences 11 of 17 What other study was a challenge? Noam Chomsky 12 of 17 What did he argue? humans can use language as they have a unique part of their brain called a 'language acquisition device' 13 of 17 How does this reject what washoe can do? Chimps dont have a LAD therefore they cant make sentences or use language. 14 of 17 For example? Washoe's signs 'washoe tickle meant tickle washoe 15 of 17 How does this evidence reject gardners' claim that chimps can use language? Their conclusions were 'wishful thinking' 16 of 17 What was wrong with chomsky's research? It was all theoretical, based on a theory 17 of 17
Comments
No comments have yet been made