More cards in this set

Card 6

Front

THE EUGENIA (1964) - Inability to comply with the specified manner of performance

Back

Preview of the front of card 6

Card 7

Front

DAVIS CONTRACTORS LTD v FAREHAM UDC (1956)

Back

Preview of the front of card 7

Card 8

Front

PIONEER SHIPPING LTD v BTP TIOXIDE LTD, THE NEMA (1981) - Radically Different ( a delay in performing the contract caused by some frustrating event)

Back

Preview of the front of card 8

Card 9

Front

DENNY, MOTT AND DICKSON LTD v JAMES B. FRASER & CO LTD (1944) - Supervening Illegality

Back

Preview of the front of card 9

Card 10

Front

MARITIME NATIONAL FISH v OCEAN TRAWLERS (1938) - Self-induced frustration

Back

Preview of the front of card 10

Card 11

Front

SUPER SERVANT 2 (1990) - Negligence being self induced frustration ( questioned in the case Joseph Constantine ** CO v Imperial Smelting Corp Ltd (1941)

Back

Preview of the front of card 11

Card 12

Front

JACKSON v UNION MARINE INSURANCE CO LTD (1874) - Force Majeure Clauses

Back

Preview of the front of card 12

Card 13

Front

TSAKIROGLOU V NOBLEE (1962) - More difficult or Expensive

Back

Preview of the front of card 13

Card 14

Front

HIRIJI MULJI v CHEONG YUE STEAMSHIP (1926) - Legal effect of Frustration

Back

Preview of the front of card 14

Card 15

Front

CHANDLER V WEBSTER (1904) - Common law originally only allowed the parties to be released of obligations at the time of frustration and onwards, they were unable to claim anything back prior to the frustrating event

Back

Preview of the front of card 15
View more cards