Free Movement of Workers

?
  • Created by: Amy
  • Created on: 26-03-17 22:53
C 413/99 Baumbast and R
The primary carer of children irrespective of his nationality has right to reside with them in order to facilitate the exercise of that right notwithstanding the fact that the parents have meanwhile divorced.
1 of 14
C-209/03 Bidar
As a french national resident in the UK for three tears B much not be discriminated against when applying for a student loan.
2 of 14
C-67/74 Bonsignore v Oberstadtdirektor der Stadt Koln
Public policy or security cannot be justified on grounds extraneous to the individual.
3 of 14
C-138/02 Collins
Concept of citizenship introduced in the TEU meant that work-seekers could claim entitlement to benefits.
4 of 14
C-137/13 Dano v Jobcentre Leipzig
MS's can refuse non-contributory benefits to nationals of other MS's where they do not have a right of residence under Directive 2004/38
5 of 14
C-295/90 European Parliament v Council
CJEU upheld the challenge of the EP and ordered that the Directive be annulled and new measure proposed.
6 of 14
C-139/85 Kempf v Staatssecretaris van Justice
Part-time work if it was 'real work' could recognise the person as a 'worker'.
7 of 14
C-66/85 Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Wurttemberg
Even if the remuneration is minimal a person can still qualify as a worker.
8 of 14
C-53/81 Levin Case
those who work part-time are 'workers' work.
9 of 14
C-127/08 Metock and others v Minister of Justice, Equality and law reform
National legislation cannot require the third-country-national spouse of an EEA citizen who is exercising free movement in a host MS to have been previously lawfully resident in another MS before they can benefit from the provisions of the Directive.
10 of 14
C-59/85 Netherlands State v Reed
If a MS does not discriminate between its own married and cohabiting couples then it cannot do so for partners from elsewhere in the EEA.
11 of 14
C-292/89 R v Immigration Appeal Tribunals, Ex p Antonissen
Work-seekers do have certain rights but these were not indefinite. The six month limit was not insufficient to lok for work.
12 of 14
C-36/75 Roland Rutili v Minisre de l'interieur
The government must give a precise and comprehensive statement of the reasons for its decision
13 of 14
C-152/73 Sotgiu v Deutsche Bundespot
Indirect disctimination meant that the German nationals were more likely to qualify for the higher allowance.
14 of 14

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

C-209/03 Bidar

Back

As a french national resident in the UK for three tears B much not be discriminated against when applying for a student loan.

Card 3

Front

C-67/74 Bonsignore v Oberstadtdirektor der Stadt Koln

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

C-138/02 Collins

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

C-137/13 Dano v Jobcentre Leipzig

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Contract resources »