What are the three justifications for derogations and where do they come from?
Grounds of public policy, public security and public health, art 52
1 of 17
What is the nature of this list?
The list is exhaustive, so MS can only derogate when using those three grounds
2 of 17
Who has the burden of proof?
The MS, they have to prove the derogation applies and show justification for it
3 of 17
How are these derogations usually interpreted by the CJ?
Quite restrictively
4 of 17
Which case do you use for public policy and public security? What was the rule?
Jany- If its ok for nationals, its ok for others. Domestic authorities can only do something if the person presents an actual threat to the public order
5 of 17
Which case do you use for public policy derogations against legal persons?
Omega- protection of fundamental rights (human dignity in this case) constituted a public policy derogation- public policy derogations can be used against legal entities like omega as well as individuals
6 of 17
Which case do you use for public health? What was the rule?
Kohll- art 52 permits MS to restrict the freedom to provide medical and hospital services if it is essential for public health.
7 of 17
Which case do you use for exercise of official authority? What doesn't count?
Reyners- lawyers, court translators, transport consultants, notaries, security guards and certification bodies all don't count
8 of 17
What does mutual recognition of qualifications mean?
it is the duty of the MS to take into account qualifications and experience obtained in another MS
9 of 17
which provision is this in?
art 53 TFEU (establishment)
10 of 17
What are case examples of this rule?
Patrick (non-discrimination), Vlassopoulou (obligation to make comparisons)
11 of 17
Which is the necessary directive?
2005/36/EC on the recognition of personal qualifications
12 of 17
What provision says the scope of this directive?
Art 2
13 of 17
Which section defines a regulated profession?
Art 3(1)(a)
14 of 17
What is a professional qualification?
Qualifications attested by evidence of formal qualifications
15 of 17
Which provision highlights the effects of the mutual recognition?
Art 4
16 of 17
What is a case example of the system being abused?
Consiglio Degli Ingegneri
17 of 17
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
What is the nature of this list?
Back
The list is exhaustive, so MS can only derogate when using those three grounds
Card 3
Front
Who has the burden of proof?
Back
Card 4
Front
How are these derogations usually interpreted by the CJ?
Back
Card 5
Front
Which case do you use for public policy and public security? What was the rule?
Comments
No comments have yet been made