Explaining differences in offendingleft R + Neo Marx 4.0 / 5 based on 1 rating ? SociologyCrime and devianceA2/A-levelAQA Created by: lw121xCreated on: 17-06-15 18:15 until the ..... it was generally agreed that minority groups had a lower crime rate 70's 1 of 29 However in the ..... conflict between afrocaribbean and police occured mid 1970's 2 of 29 until the 90's asian crime was not viewed a problem 3 of 29 the 9/11 in 2001 helped margianlise these groups especially muslims 4 of 29 Left realism statistics reflect real differences in the rates of offending 5 of 29 Neo Marxism statistics are a social construct resulting from the labelling and criminal justice system 6 of 29 Left realists believe that crime is a result of relative deprivation, subculture and marginalisation 7 of 29 ethnic monorities poor, housing at the same as materialism in th media and they can't gain it legitimately 8 of 29 Subcultures form according to left realists utilitarian and non ultitarian ( no orgainsations to represent them) 9 of 29 who argues that police often unjustly crimilaise ethnic groups sometimes Lea + Young (Left Realists) 10 of 29 Left realists do not think that racist polcing is rge naub problem for example.... % of crime are reported by public 90 11 of 29 Lea and Young argue we cannot explain police racism because asians are treated favourably compared to black 12 of 29 Lea and Young argues there is a real difference that leads to high crime rates 13 of 29 Lea and young have been criticised Asians have a different role than blacks, blacks stereotype dangerous 14 of 29 Streotypes have changed since the 9/11 asains are seen more dangerous 15 of 29 Neomarxists believe that statistics do not reflect reality 16 of 29 Neomarxists believe in a social construction in crime for example ethinic minorities more criminal than the majority of the population 17 of 29 Gilroy is a Neo Marxist 18 of 29 Gilroy argues that ethnic minorities are no more criminal than any other it just appears so because of the CJS acting on stereotypes 19 of 29 Gilroy argues that ethic minorities were a form of ..... aginstthe British impericalism political resistance 20 of 29 who argues that when blacks found racism in britain they resisted the oppression like in early colonies gilroy 21 of 29 Gilroy argues that blacks political struggle was criminalised by the state 22 of 29 Lea and Young Critique Gilroy - first immigrants were very law abdiding unlikley to pass down anti colonial struggles 23 of 29 critique gilroy most crime intraethnic so can't be anti colonial struggle 24 of 29 who looked at the moral panic over muggers in the blacks Hall 25 of 29 Hall argued in the 1970's there was finacial crisis so mugging crime was used as a scapegoat 26 of 29 'New crime' according to Hall just replaced the 'old crime' of theiving which already esxisted 27 of 29 Hall argues that moral panic caused blacks new lifestyle of crime 28 of 29 Hall does not show evidence that the..... were blaming blacks public 29 of 29
Comments
No comments have yet been made