When we lived in times when hygiene was an issue, being concerned about dirt and contamination was an adaptive advantage
2 of 12
Why might checking have been adaptive?
When living in a dangerous environment with predators/climate, checking everything would improve the chances of passing on genes
3 of 12
Obsessions could have lead people to produce states...
Which allowed them to be alert and survive (fear, agitation)
4 of 12
What did Abed & de Pauw 1988 suggest?
Obsessions are uncontrollable thoughts that produce strong aversive states. These orginate from part of the brain known as involuntary risk scenario generating
5 of 12
What does this allow?
Allows you work ways and means of avoiding harm in safety without having to confront real life dangers
6 of 12
How can this be applied to OCD?
OCD involves the over-activation of warning signals related to stimuli and situations that were potentially dangerous
7 of 12
OCD probably once was...
Adaptive
8 of 12
All evolutionary explanations are...
Un-falsifiable
9 of 12
Some obbesssions are clearly..
Not adaptive such as wanting your partner dead
10 of 12
If it OCD is innate, this means...
Everyone should develop OCD... But they don't
11 of 12
OCD patients have disturbing...
Thoughts which affect functioning, so is not adaptive
12 of 12
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Why might this have once been adaptive?
Back
When we lived in times when hygiene was an issue, being concerned about dirt and contamination was an adaptive advantage
Card 3
Front
Why might checking have been adaptive?
Back
Card 4
Front
Obsessions could have lead people to produce states...
Comments
No comments have yet been made