Evaluation: Bottom-Up Approach 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyCriminological and Forensic PsychologyOffender ProfilingBottom-Up ApproachA2/A-levelAQA Created by: mayono1Created on: 17-09-18 09:27 Who found evidence to support investigative psychology? David Canter and Ruper Heritage (1990) 1 of 10 What did Canter and Heritage do? They conducted a content analysis of 66 sexual assault cases using the statistical technique smallest space analysis 2 of 10 What did Canter and Heritage find? That several characteristics were common in most cases, such as impersonal language and lack of reaction to the victim 3 of 10 Why is Canter and Heritage's evidence a strength? It leads to an understanding of how an offender's behaviour may change over a series of offences 4 of 10 What does Canter and Heritage's evidence support about IP? The usefulness because it shows how statistical techniques can be applied 5 of 10 Who found evidence to support geographical profiling? Samantha Lundrigan and David Canter (2001) 6 of 10 What did Lundrigan and Canter do? They collated information from 120 murder cases involving serial killers in the USA 7 of 10 What did Lundrigan and Canter find? Smallest space analysis revealed spatial consistency in the behaviour of the killers and the offenders base was in the centre of the pattern. 8 of 10 What does Lundrigan and Canter's evidence support about GP? It supports the claim that spatial information is a key factor in determining the base of an offender 9 of 10 What is a limitation of the bottom up approach? It requires statistical info about previous crimes, which can be difficult to gather and it can lead to incomplete or inaccurate conclusions. 10 of 10
Comments
No comments have yet been made