Crossword for cases, elements of a crime Cases for elements of a crime, actus reus and mens rea 3.0 / 5 based on 1 rating ? LawASAQA Created by: KateCreated on: 10-02-13 17:07 Where the court gave examples of not acting voluntarily HillvBaxter 1 of 30 Defendant had a contractual duty to act RvPitwood 2 of 30 Defendants voluntarily took on a duty RvStoneandDobinson 3 of 30 Defendant created a dangerous situation and failed to remove it RvMiller 4 of 30 Defendant had a certain relationship with victim which required them to act RvGibbinsandProcter 5 of 30 Court held that this case was a continuing act and not an omission FaganvMPC 6 of 30 Court held but for the defendants actions the victim would still have died RvWhite 7 of 30 But for the defendants actions victim would not have died RvPagett 8 of 30 Legal causation defendant was the operating and significant cause RvSmith 9 of 30 Thin Skull Rule, taking the victim as you find them RvBlaue 10 of 30 Case that states medical treatment rarely breaks the chain of causation RvCheshire 11 of 30 Case that shows medical treatment rarely breaks the chain of causation RvMalcherek 12 of 30 Case that shows exceptional circumstances where medical treatment did break the chain of causation RvJordan 13 of 30 Case where court stated the principle of direct intention RvMohan 14 of 30 Court held there was a virtual certainity of the defendants actions RvWoolin 15 of 30 Case where court held there was oblique intention RvMatthewsandAlleyne 16 of 30 Case where the court looked at the definition of recklessness RvCunningham 17 of 30 Case that stated foreseeability RVGandR 18 of 30 Coincidence of mens rea and actus reus, continuing act FaganvMPC 19 of 30 Series of acts following plan of action coincidence of AR and MR RvThaboMeli 20 of 30 Court held there was transferred malice RvLatimer 21 of 30 Court held that silence copuld still result in assault RvIreland 22 of 30 Principle that words alone could amount to an assault RvConstanza 23 of 30 Court infered victim was in fear of immediate violence on the basis that she didn't know what was going to happen next SmithvChiefSuperintendentWokingPoliceStation 24 of 30 Case stated it was not necessary for there to be physical proximity for assault RvIreland 25 of 30 Court stated 'immediate' can inclue the near future RvConstanza 26 of 30 Lord Goff stated what wasn't included in battery in this case CollinsvWilcock 27 of 30 case that stated battery can be committed even with no direct physical contact HaysteadvChiefConstableDerbyshire 28 of 30 Case involving a minor with no direct physical contact DPPvK 29 of 30 Battery accidentally still amounts to battery RvSavage 30 of 30
Comments
No comments have yet been made