• Created by: rachel.m
  • Created on: 04-12-14 11:06
Define Crime
An act that is against the law
1 of 33
Define Criminal Psychology
The application of psychological principles to all aspects of crime
2 of 33
Define Recividism
When someone repeats a crime or a behavious for which they have either been punished or recieved treatment
3 of 33
Define Anti-Social Behaviour
Any behavious that affects other people badly, often means aggressive behavious but may not always be a crime
4 of 33
Define Eye Witness Testimony
An account people give of an incident they have witnessed (seen)
5 of 33
Define Token Economy
The programmes used to obtain desirable behavious in closed institutions, e.g prisons. They are a form of behaviou modification used for juvenile and adult offenders
6 of 33
Define Modelling
Refers to the behavious eing demonstrated as well as produced (ARRM)
7 of 33
Describe SLT
- Attention = py attention to model (those we percieve to be attractive etc) // Retention = Remebering what has been observed // Reproduction = Memories translated into actions // Motivation = needed to continue reproduction E.g Vicarious Reinf.
8 of 33
Summarise the findings of one piece of supporting evidence for SLT
B,R+R (1961) / most aggression seen in children shown an agg. model / Boys more likely to copy male model for phys,verb,non-imit+gun play - SIGNIFICANT / Girls more likely to copy a female model for verb/non-imit. - NOT SIGNIFICANT
9 of 33
Describe the procedure of Bandura, Ross and Ross (1961)
Boys and girls observed models of both sexes modelling aggressive and non-aggressive behaviour towards a bobo doll (and a control group that saw no model)
10 of 33
How does B,R+R (1961) support SLT? (Fred West)
Explainscriminal behaviour / A = father - agg. model - same sex | mother - agg. model (rabbit beater/gun use) / R = remembered + learned how they acted to the point where it was 'normal' / Repeated this / M = Got attention form parents - V.R
11 of 33
Strengths of SLT as an explanation for criminal behaviour
Application - understnads causes and therefore uses the right intervention (+ve role models) / Supporting evidence = B,R+R (1961) - procedures, findings, why its a strength
12 of 33
Weaknesses of SLT as an explanation for criminal behaviour
Criticism = criminal activity that hasnt been observed? Individual Differences? Biology? / B,R+R - Lacks ec.val, Hard to generalise, Demand C's, Limited sample // Alt. Theory = Criminal Pers. + description
13 of 33
What is Desensitisation?
One explanation for how watching violence on t.v. might lead to vilent actions that assumes we et so used to watching violence that intitial feelings of shock + emotion diminish so we no longer have such a strong reaction to violence
14 of 33
What does Disinhibition assume?
That watching actions that are so far away from normal social norms reduces our inhibitions and leads us to do things we wouldn't otherwise do
15 of 33
According to Eysenck's Criminal Personality Theory, ASB is caused by what?
An interaction between genetic factos associated wiht personality and environmental influences
16 of 33
A particualr nervous system causes what..?
A predisposition to criminality that can be pased on through genetics
17 of 33
Personality types respond to environmental stimuli differently. Give two examples
Extroverts = dampened RAS so seek external stimulation e.g risk-taking/ASB to restore the balance /// Introverts = high levels of internal arousal so seek to reduce stimulation levels e.g. sit quietly
18 of 33
Descirbe the features of a neurotic individual
unstable // neuroticism is linked to ANS as sympathetic division is quick to turn on and parasympathetic division is slow to turn off - criminality is linked to impulsivity and violent response (fight)
19 of 33
What combination of personality types are more likely to seek out anti-social activity and resist social-conditioning?
High neuroticism and extroversion
20 of 33
Why are psychotic individuals the most dangerous?
They lack empathy so can harm or distress others without guilt or remorse
21 of 33
Describe one piece of evidence supporting Eysenck's theory
He found himself that amongst convicted prisoners there was a sig. no. of high E+N scores and significantly more high E+N amongst criinals than amongst non-offenders
22 of 33
Describe another piece of evidence supporting his theory
He also found that most serious criminals, murderers, rapists etc. had the crucial combination of high E+N+P scores
23 of 33
Descrive the third piece of supporting evidence for his theory
Rushton & Christjohn (1981) compared E+N scores with self-reports of delinquency in school children and found the self-confessed "delinquents" were the highest E+N scores
24 of 33
Describe one piece of evidence against the theory
Farrington et al (1982) reviewed 16 studies whihc had looked at the association between E,N+P scores and criminal convictions found that in the majority of cases there was a clear association with P and N but not necessarily on E
25 of 33
Describe another piece of evidence against the theory
Hollin (1989) agrees that the E score is not so closely associated as N&P
26 of 33
Describe the final piece of evidence against the theory (following on from the previous point)
Putwain & Sammons (2002) point out that this could be that E measures both sociability and impulsiveness. Criminality may be associated with the latter, but not the former. Thus, the E scale may need to be re-thought.
27 of 33
Give two weakness of his theory
Most of the studies have compared E,N,P scores between convicted criminals and the general population // This leaves out criminals who haven't been caught - perhaps this theory can only explain ineffective criminals' personalities
28 of 33
Give two more weaknesses of his theory
Eysenck's theory tells us that rapists and child abusers are high E,P+N scorers but DOESNT TELL US WHY // Therefore his theory is mroe decriptive than it is explanatory
29 of 33
Give two strengths of his theory
It is useful when trying to prevent crime as it suggests that pre-criminal tendencies can be detected and measured during childhood
30 of 33
Give two more strengths of the theory
It may be possible to modify socialisation for potentially high-risk individuals, to prevent them developing into offenders // Eysenck saw this as a real possibility and advocated social engineering for this purpose
31 of 33
Give five similarities between SLT and Eysenck
They both provide explanations for criminal behaviour // both see the env. as having a role / both use criminal personalities in their research (SLT - Farrington/ Eysenck - Rushton and Christjohn (1981) / Neither can tell cause and effect /Prevention
32 of 33
Give three differences
Eysenck has a biological point of view whereas SLT has a social view // Eysenck take sinto account the role of the CNS and RAS // Eysenck has more supportive evidence outside the theory e.g Raine et al
33 of 33

Other cards in this set

Card 2


Define Criminal Psychology


The application of psychological principles to all aspects of crime

Card 3


Define Recividism


Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4


Define Anti-Social Behaviour


Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5


Define Eye Witness Testimony


Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards


No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Criminological and Forensic Psychology resources »