Criminal Damage 0.0 / 5 ? LawCriminal lawA2/A-levelAQA Created by: georgiaball10Created on: 12-05-16 10:32 What is defined in S1 (1) Criminal Damage Act 1971? Criminal damage 1 of 25 What case is used in damage/destroy? Roe v Kingerlee 2 of 25 Which case demonstrates time money and effort to fix (drawings on pavement)? Hardman v CC of Avon 3 of 25 Which case demonstrated time money and effort to fix (biblical quote)? Blake v DPP 4 of 25 Which case demonstrates no permanent damage but time to return to normal (blanket in toilet) Fiak 5 of 25 Which case demonstrates that no cost or effort in clean up = no offence? R v A 6 of 25 Which case demonstrates that property damaged is a relevant consideration? Morphies and Salmon 7 of 25 What is defined in S10 (1)? Property 8 of 25 What is defined in S10 (2)? belonging to another 9 of 25 Which case demonstrates that there must be intention to do the damage (no intention)? Pembilton 10 of 25 Which case demonstrates there must be intention to do the damage (intention)? Seroy-white 11 of 25 Which case demonstrates that they must intent to do damage to property belonging to another? Smith 12 of 25 Which case demonstrates recklessness? G and R 13 of 25 What is defined in S1 (2)? aggravated criminal damage 14 of 25 Which case demonstrates MR for aggravated is must intend for damage to endanger life (not aggravated)? Steer 15 of 25 Which case demonstrates MR for aggravated is must intend for damage to endanger life (aggravated)? Webster 16 of 25 Which case demonstrated it doesn't matter if life wasn't actually endangered? Sangha 17 of 25 Which case demonstrated that for aggravated it doesn't matter whose property it is? Merrick 18 of 25 What is defined in S1 (3) CDA 71? Arson 19 of 25 Which case demonstrated that arson can be committed by omission? Miller 20 of 25 What is defined in S5(2) CDA'71? Without lawful excuse 21 of 25 Which case demonstrated that setting fire to bed to draw attention to faulty alarm was not protecting other property? Hunt 22 of 25 Which case demonstrated not allowed to protect people? Banker and Wilkins 23 of 25 Which case demonstrates honest belief? Denton 24 of 25 Which case demonstrated being intoxicated does not affect the defence Jaggard v Dickinson 25 of 25
Comments
No comments have yet been made