Crimean Army organisation 0.0 / 5 ? HistoryWarfareA2/A-levelEdexcel Created by: elle1999Created on: 03-02-17 17:45 What were Wellington's key areas of influence? No interference, 43-9.5 billion and conservative policies. 1 of 14 What were issues with Raglan's appointment? No active service since 1815 2 of 14 What was an issue with divisional command? 1/5 of command under 60. 3 of 14 What were issues wit those in Army? Buying commissions still in place, many no service and smaller army from landed gentry. 4 of 14 Why did people join? Brought commissions, tradition and honour and family. 5 of 14 What problems did administration system cause? Procrastination and Wellingtons dominance means never changed. 6 of 14 What issues with recruiting? Still poor pay, families expected to live with soldiers and harsh discipline but reduced to max of 50. 7 of 14 Why was there no change? No European conflict, no thought into organisation however had mini rifle better than smoothbore rifle. 8 of 14 When was Neil-Tulloch report? 1855 9 of 14 What did it criticise? Raglan and his staff. 10 of 14 Why was there a lack of impetus for change? Politician focus on economy and Espirit de corps damaged. 11 of 14 What were the military reforms from 1956-68 Barrack staff, Nightingale, best weapons 12 of 14 What were Cardwell's reforms 1868-74? Short term enlistments, divisions and 1872 localisation act home army and abolished buying commissions scheme. 13 of 14 How effective were these reforms? Comisssions being abolished didn't alter social class, no planning and localisation didn't work. 14 of 14
Comments
No comments have yet been made