CORE STUDIES 1
0.0 / 5
- Created by: macy1
- Created on: 18-06-18 17:09
SPERRY SAMPLE
- 11 split barin patients
1 of 99
CASEY SAMPLE
-562, 155, 135, 117. 59 (L H ). 27 ( L H)
2 of 99
LOFTUS & PALMER SAMPLE
- 9 x 5 = experiment 1 - 50 x 3 = experiment 2
3 of 99
BANDURA SAMPLE
-72 participants (37-69) from Stanford uni nursery
4 of 99
CHANEY SAMPLE
-32 participants
5 of 99
FREUD SAMPLE
-Little Hans (3-5)
6 of 99
BARON-COHEN SAMPLE
-16 with autism, 50 normal, 10 with Tourettes
7 of 99
MILGRAM SAMPLE
-40 males (20-50) obtained through a news paper advert and direct mail about a study on memory and learning , paid $4.50
8 of 99
BOCCHIARO SAMPLE
-149 undergraduate participants from VU university Amsterdam
9 of 99
LOFTUS & PALMER PROCEUDRE.1
-All participants were shown the same 7 clips of a driver safety video, they were then asked to complete a questionnaire with the critical q "about how fast were the cars going when they smashed/contacted/collided/bumped/hit into each other?"
10 of 99
MILGRAM FINDINGS
-100% to 300V. 65% to 450V
11 of 99
SPERRY SCIENCE
-All participants were presented with information from the tachistoscope for the same amount fo time (1/10 of a second)
12 of 99
CASEY SCIENCE
-All participants each completed the same tasks, each face appeared for 500ms
13 of 99
LOFTUS & PALMER USEFULNESS
-Shows how the language of a question can affect an individuals memory. Shows how leading questions can create false memories. Applicable in court
14 of 99
LOFTUS & PALMER SCIENCE
-All participants were shown the same driver safety films and completed the same questionnaire
15 of 99
BANDURA NATURE NURTURE
-Nature= some participants were more aggressive than others in the pre-tests. Nurture= participants in the aggressive model condition were overall more aggressive than any other participants
16 of 99
CHANEY RELIABILITY
-Self report means parents could have lied, unreliable. However, it can be replicated
17 of 99
FREUD RELIABILITY
-Cant be replicated as it was a case study, unreliable as little hans could have been abnormal
18 of 99
MILGRAM RELIABILITY
- Standardised procedures make it replicable
19 of 99
SPEERRY ETHICS
-No harm or deception
20 of 99
CASEY ETHICS
-No harm or deception
21 of 99
LOFTUS & PALMER ETHICS
-No harm or deception
22 of 99
BANDURA ETHICS
-Psychological harm. No informed consent. No right to withdraw.
23 of 99
FREUD ETHICS
-No confidentilaity. Psychological harm. No right to withdraw. No informed consent.
24 of 99
BARON-COHEN ETHICS
-No deception. However, could be humiliating as a fatal flaw is being presented and highlighted
25 of 99
MILGRAM ETHICS
-Deception, thought they were taking part in a memory and learning study.Barriers to withdrawing. Psychological harm.
26 of 99
BOCCHIARO ETHICS
-Deceived. Could have felt more obliged to take part as it was conducted at their own university.
27 of 99
BANDURA HOLISM
-recorded a number of different behaviours (physical and verbal aggression, mallet, punches doll, gun play and non-imitative aggression), also considered the affect of genetics
28 of 99
GRANT ETHICS
-No harm or deception
29 of 99
CHANEY ETHICS
-No harm or deception, however interfering with their medial regime could be questionable
30 of 99
GRANT SAMPLE
-39 participants recruited by 8 psychology students (17-56)
31 of 99
BOCCHIARO FINDINGS
-
32 of 99
SPERRY FINDINGS
-Information presented to the RVF could be described in speech and writing, if presented to the LVF it couldn't be described. Objects placed in right hand could be described, left hand couldn't.
33 of 99
CASEY FINDINGS
-
34 of 99
BANDURA FINIDNGS
-
35 of 99
CHANEY FINDINGS
-
36 of 99
FREUD FINDINGS
-Hans fear of horses symbolised his father.His fascination with his widdler was due to the OC. Giraffe fantasy symbolised him trying to steal his mother away. Plumber fantasy was the OC resolution
37 of 99
BARON-COHEN FINDINGS
-The autism group made significantly more errors on the Strange Stories task than either of the other groups.On the Gender and Emotion control tasks, there were no differences between the groups.
38 of 99
LOFTUS & PALMER FINDINGS
-
39 of 99
GRANT FINDINGS
-
40 of 99
SPERRY METHOD
- Quasi experiment
41 of 99
CASEY METHOD
-Quasi experiment. Longitudinal study
42 of 99
LOFTUS & PALMER METHOD
-Laboratory experiment with independent measures
43 of 99
GRANT METHOD
-Laboratory experiment with independent measures
44 of 99
BANDURA METHOD
-Laboratory experiment with independent measures and matched participants
45 of 99
CHANEY METHOD
-Field study with repeated measures
46 of 99
FREUD METHOD
-Longitudinal case study
47 of 99
BARON-COHEN METHOD
-Quasi experiment with independent measures
48 of 99
MILGRAM METHOD
-Laboratory experiment/ controlled observation
49 of 99
BOCCHAIRIO METHOD
-Laboratory experiment/ scenario study
50 of 99
SPERRY PROCEDURE
-
51 of 99
CASEY PROCEDURE
-
52 of 99
LOFTUS & PALMER PROCEDURE.2
-
53 of 99
GRANT PROCEDURE
-
54 of 99
BANDURA PROCEDURE
-
55 of 99
CHANEY PROCEDURE
-
56 of 99
FRUED PROCEDURE
-
57 of 99
BARON-COHEN PROCEDURE
-
58 of 99
MILGRAM PROCEDURE
-
59 of 99
BOCCHIARO PROCEDURE
-
60 of 99
SPERRY RELIABILITY
-All participants were presented with information from the tachistoscope for the same amount fo time (1/10 of a second)
61 of 99
CASEY RELIABILITY
-All participants each completed the same tasks, each face appeared for 500ms
62 of 99
LOFTUS & PALMER RELIABILITY
-All participants were shown the same driver safety films and completed the same questionnaire
63 of 99
GRANT RELIABILITY
-
64 of 99
BANDURA RELIABILITY
-
65 of 99
BARON-COHEN RELIABILITY
-
66 of 99
BOCCHIARO RELIABILITY
-
67 of 99
SPERRY VALIDITY
-Low ecological (lacks mundane realism), low population (small sample), high internal (sp)
68 of 99
CASEY VALIDITY
-Low ecological (lacks mundane realism), low population (small sample), high internal (sp)
69 of 99
LOFTUS & PALMER VALIDITY
-Low ecological (lacks mundane realism), low population (uni students), high internal (sp)
70 of 99
GRANT VALIDITY
-Low ecological (lacks mundane realism), low population (uni students), high internal (sp)
71 of 99
BANDURA VALIDITY
-Low ecological (lacks mundane realism), low population (children from one area), high internal (sp)
72 of 99
CHANEY VALIDITY
-High ecological (own homes), low population, ethnocentric (Australia), low internal (self-report)
73 of 99
FREUD VALIDITY
-Low population, ethnocentric, low internal
74 of 99
BARON-COHEN VALIDITY
-Low ecological, low population, high internal
75 of 99
MILGRAM VALIDITY
-Low ecological, low population, high internal
76 of 99
BOCCHIARO VALIDITY
-Low ecological, low population, high internal
77 of 99
SPERRY
-
78 of 99
CASEY
-
79 of 99
GRANT
-
80 of 99
GRANT
-
81 of 99
CHANEY
-
82 of 99
BARON-COHEN
-
83 of 99
BARON-COHEN
-
84 of 99
MILGRAM
-
85 of 99
FREUD
-
86 of 99
FREUD
-
87 of 99
MILGRAM
-
88 of 99
CHANEY
-
89 of 99
SPERRY BIOLOGICAL
-
90 of 99
CASEY BIOLOGICAL
-
91 of 99
LOFTUS & PALMER COGNITIVE
-
92 of 99
GRANT COGNITIVE
-
93 of 99
BANDURA DEVELOPMENTAL
-
94 of 99
CHANEY DEVELOPMENTAL
-
95 of 99
FREDU I.DIFFERENCES
-
96 of 99
BARON-COHEN I.DIFFERENCES
-
97 of 99
MILGRAM SOCIAL
-
98 of 99
BOCCHIARO SOCIAL
-
99 of 99
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
CASEY SAMPLE
Back
-562, 155, 135, 117. 59 (L H ). 27 ( L H)
Card 3
Front
LOFTUS & PALMER SAMPLE
Back
Card 4
Front
BANDURA SAMPLE
Back
Card 5
Front
CHANEY SAMPLE
Back
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Self-teaching A-Level Further Mathematics in One Month Blog »
- How can i sit A level further maths? »
- What happens if...? »
- A level Edexcel Politics »
- I feel like I screwed up. »
- Required practicals chemistry A level »
- A level further maths modules (edexcel) »
- How many GCSEs are you getting? »
- Study an MBA at Bradford | Thread »
- Should I even consider applying for Oxford? »
Similar Psychology resources:
0.0 / 5
1.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
2.5 / 5 based on 2 ratings
3.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
0.0 / 5
2.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
0.0 / 5
3.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
Comments
No comments have yet been made