Contract Law - Offers & Agreements Cases 0.0 / 5 ? LawContract LawUniversityNone Created by: cephillipsCreated on: 07-05-14 10:33 "What would the reasonable man have concluded from the events?" - Objective Test of Agreement The Hannah Blumenthal [1983] 1 of 23 Adverts are generally ITT's Partridge v Crittendon [1968] 2 of 23 Explicit Adverts are sometimes considered offers (e.g "first three buyers") Lefkowitz v Greater Minneapolis Surplus Store US [1957] 3 of 23 Showing an intention to act on a advert makes it an offer (£1000 in bank) Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball [1892] 4 of 23 Shops Displays are generally ITT's Boots Cash Chemists [1953] & Fisher v Bell [1961] 5 of 23 Auctions are generally ITT's/Unless without reserve British Car Auctions v Wright [1972] / Warlow v Harrison [1859] 6 of 23 Requests for tenders are ITT's/Unless stated highest to be accepted Blackpool & Fyfe Aeroclub [1990] / Harvela Investments [1886] 7 of 23 An offer requires an intention to be bound Harvey v Facey [1893] 8 of 23 Cannot accept in ignorance of offer Tinn v Hoffman & Co [1873] 9 of 23 Postal Acceptance Rule Adams v Linsell [1818] 10 of 23 PAR does not apply if would lead to absurdity Holwell Securities [1974] 11 of 23 PAR does not apply to revocation of offers Henthorn v Fraser [1892] 12 of 23 PAR means acceptance does not need to arrive Household Fire and Carriage Accident Insurance [1878] 13 of 23 Offeror can prescribe mode of acceptance Manchester DCE v Gibson [1970] 14 of 23 Offers can be accepted by conduct, but generally not silence Felthouse v Brindley [1862] 15 of 23 Revocation is not allowed after acceptance of an offer Byrne and Co. v Van Tieerhoven [1880] 16 of 23 Revocation can be communicated by reliable third parties Dickinson v Dodds [1876] 17 of 23 Revocation of Unilateral offers must be reasonably published Shuey v US [1875] USA 18 of 23 Offers can have time limits Dickinson v Dodds [1876] 19 of 23 Offers always lapse after a "reasonable time" Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefirore [1866] 20 of 23 Deposits keep open time limits Routledge v Grant [1852] 21 of 23 Offers cannot be withdrawn once completion has begun Errington v Errington [1952] 22 of 23 Counter offers destroy original offer Hyde v Wrench [1840] 23 of 23
ROSE & FRANK v CROMPTON BROS (1925) INTENTION TO CREATE LEGAL RELATION: 'Binding in honour only' 0.0 / 5
Comments
No comments have yet been made