Other questions in this quiz

2. brinkibon v stahag stahl

  • instantaneous during office hours
  • a request for information is not a counter offer
  • posted to correct address with stamp doesn’t matter if it is lost
  • silence does not amount to acceptance

3. Stevenson v McLean

  • a request for information is not a counter offer
  • silence does not amount to acceptance
  • the acceptance has no effect until it is communicated to the offeror
  • acceptance by conduct

4. Thomas v Thomas

  • consideration need not be adequate but must be sufficient
  • no consideration for part payment of a debt
  • argument between sufficiency and adequacy confirmed that that consideration only needs to be sufficient
  • some interest, right or profit benefiting one party and some forbearance, detriment or loss or responsibility to the other party.

5. Edwards v skyways

  • no intention to create legal relations between family members
  • there is intention to create legal relations in a commercial agreement.
  • where parties are not related to each other the courts are more likely to find legal relations
  • the courts are reluctant to find intention to create legal relation in a demostic setting

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Contract resources »