contract law

HideShow resource information
  • Created by: Shahjahan
  • Created on: 10-05-16 19:30

1. Stilk v myrick

  • no consideration for part payment of a debt
  • consideration must move prom the promisee
  • performing existing duty is not good consideration
  • sufficient consideration as there was a practical benefit to the promisor and the promiser suggested this in the first place
1 of 20

Other questions in this quiz

2. Pinnels case

  • consideration must move prom the promisee
  • performing existing duty is not good consideration
  • no consideration for part payment of a debt
  • consideration need not be adequate but must be sufficient

3. Re Mcardle

  • consideration must move prom the promisee
  • exception where past consideration is a precursor to the full consideration
  • Consideration must not be past
  • consideration need not be adequate but must be sufficient

4. Williams v roffey

  • no consideration for part payment of a debt
  • performing existing duty is not good consideration
  • sufficient consideration as there was a practical benefit to the promisor and the promiser suggested this in the first place
  • consideration must move prom the promisee

5. Currie v mirsa

  • exception where past consideration is a precursor to the full consideration
  • Consideration must not be past
  • some interest, right or profit benefiting one party and some forbearance, detriment or loss or responsibility to the other party.
  • consideration must move prom the promisee

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Contract resources »