Consideration 0.0 / 5 ? LawContract LawUniversityNone Created by: deepaCreated on: 19-01-15 21:45 Misa v Currie promisee and promisor must each receive a benefit and suffer a detriment 1 of 8 Thomas v Thomas must be sufficient but not necessarily adequate (£1 per annum was sufficient) 2 of 8 Williams v Roffey promise to pay the rest of the money was sufficient consideration 3 of 8 Re McArdle consideration must not be in the past - promise to make another payment after consideration is not legally binding 4 of 8 Tweddle v Atkinson consideration cannot move from a 3rd party 5 of 8 Stilk v Myrrick existing contractual duty cannot be used as consideration for a new promise (e.g. payment) 6 of 8 Pinnel part-payment is not sufficient even if agreed to 7 of 8 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball in unilateral contracts: executed consideration = a promise in exchange for an act 8 of 8
Comments
No comments have yet been made