Consent defence cases

?
R v Brown & Others
You cannot consent to injuries above a S.39 assault or battery
1 of 7
R v Wilson
You can consent to surgical interference (in this case a brand onto the skin)
2 of 7
R v Burrell & Hammer
True or valid consent must be given (In this case, victim was too young to get a tattoo)
3 of 7
R v Billinghurst
You can consent to injuries during sport but not those so beyond the rules of the game (in this case, the victim was punched during a rugby game)
4 of 7
R v Jones & R v Aitken
You can consent to horseplay (rough play)
5 of 7
R v Tabassum
Consent must be genuine or true (In this case, the defendent was pretending to be medically qualified)
6 of 7
R v Collins & Wilcock
We all consent to every day contact
7 of 7

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

You can consent to surgical interference (in this case a brand onto the skin)

Back

R v Wilson

Card 3

Front

True or valid consent must be given (In this case, victim was too young to get a tattoo)

Back

Preview of the back of card 3

Card 4

Front

You can consent to injuries during sport but not those so beyond the rules of the game (in this case, the victim was punched during a rugby game)

Back

Preview of the back of card 4

Card 5

Front

You can consent to horseplay (rough play)

Back

Preview of the back of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Law of Tort resources »