Compellability of Witnesses

?
What is the general rule?
All competent witnesses are compellable
1 of 15
What happens if you are compellable but refuse to give evidence (2 possible outcomes)
Either arrested or found guilty of contempt of court (Yusuf)
2 of 15
What are 2 reasons why this compellability/cooperation is taken so seriously?
Practical matter (individual witnesses can't just be the arbiter of what they decide to do) + principled (D has right to fair trial)
3 of 15
Which provision is relevant for D's compellability?
s.1 Criminal Evidence Act 1898
4 of 15
Can compellability stretch beyond D?
Yes - if there is a chance a prosecution/charge might result from it (Blunt) OR where there is a reasonable ground to apprehend danger to W from his being compelled (Boyes
5 of 15
Which provision of PACE is relevant for compellability of D's close family?
s.80
6 of 15
How did the case Bala define "spouse"?
Someone who is part of a union recognised by English law as a marriage or civil partnership
7 of 15
Where was a distinction drawn between factual cases involving assault + legal cases involving assault? What is an example of a legal case?
A (B) (Legal = those involving assault in their definition --> only legal fits under s.80(3))
8 of 15
Is this approach taken to spouses compatible with ECHR art.8?
Yes, failure of argument that unmarried couple should come under scope of art.8: Pearce
9 of 15
What are 2 other ways in which evidence might be admitted?
Via s.114(1)(d) CJA 2003 or through an out-of-court, pre-trial statement
10 of 15
Why do some people argue that this area of law should be reformed?
Based on controversial idea of sanctity of marriage + all attempts should be made to avoid putting a strain on it
11 of 15
Which jurisdiction has completely abolished these comparability rules?
Scotland
12 of 15
What model does Brabyn propose?
General non-compellability of close family, exemption procedure for step-family, procedure for P to compel non-compellable witness, special rules for violent/sexual offences
13 of 15
What does Spencer say about USA?
If spouse takes advantage of non-compellabiltiy rule, their previous statements are admissible as hearsay
14 of 15
What does spencer say about France?
Spouse has to testify but doesn't have to be sworn in
15 of 15

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

What happens if you are compellable but refuse to give evidence (2 possible outcomes)

Back

Either arrested or found guilty of contempt of court (Yusuf)

Card 3

Front

What are 2 reasons why this compellability/cooperation is taken so seriously?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Which provision is relevant for D's compellability?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Can compellability stretch beyond D?

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal Procedure and Criminal Evidence resources »