Certainty and Intention to Create Legal Relations Cases

HideShow resource information
Vague agreements generally void contracts
Scammel v Ouston [1941]
1 of 8
Vague agreements don't void if parties acting on contract
jet2.com v Blackpool Airport [2012]
2 of 8
Court infers terms into vague contracts
Hillas v Arcos [1932]
3 of 8
Incomplete agreements void contracts
Watford v Miles [1992]
4 of 8
Agreements to agree are unenforceable/ unless contractual mechanism to resolve stated
Toalini Brothers (Hotels) [1975]/ Classique Coaches [1934]
5 of 8
Social and Domestic Agreements lack presumption of intention TCR/ except in divorces & when one party detrimentally relies on promise
Balfour v Balfour [1919]/ Merritt v Merritt [1970] & Parker v Clark [1960]
6 of 8
Commercial agreements have a presumption of ITCR
Rose & Frank v JR Compton Bros [1925]
7 of 8
Courts are unwilling to void contracts where performance has begun
Novinex Ltd [1941] per Denning
8 of 8

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Vague agreements don't void if parties acting on contract

Back

jet2.com v Blackpool Airport [2012]

Card 3

Front

Court infers terms into vague contracts

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Incomplete agreements void contracts

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Agreements to agree are unenforceable/ unless contractual mechanism to resolve stated

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Contract Law resources »